❌

Normal view

There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.
Before yesterdayMain stream

Too bald, too mad, too red … How royal portraits get it so wrong

18 May 2024 at 08:00

Jonathan Yeo’s divisive painting of the king raises the question of whether paintings of the monarchy have become irrelevant and anachronisitic

Why do reports always say that a portrait of someone great and good has been β€œunveiled”? The word is an empty metaphor that turns the first viewing into a ceremony; it also mystifies the entire procedure and makes it somewhat morbid.

Portraits of kings, presidents, prime ministers and the like are effigies, meant to replace the mortal being. Once the official image has been fixed in place, the living subject can be sent off to die. The unveiled portrait draws a veil over another ceremonial occasion: what we are looking at is posterity’s verdict, so in effect we are attending a funeral.

Continue reading...

πŸ’Ύ

Β© Photograph: Aaron Chown/AP

πŸ’Ύ

Β© Photograph: Aaron Chown/AP

❌
❌