Normal view

There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.
Today — 18 May 2024Main stream

SEC: Financial orgs have 30 days to send data breach notifications – Source: www.bleepingcomputer.com

sec:-financial-orgs-have-30-days-to-send-data-breach-notifications-–-source:-wwwbleepingcomputer.com

Source: www.bleepingcomputer.com – Author: Bill Toulas The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has adopted amendments to Regulation S-P that require certain financial institutions to disclose data breach incidents to impacted individuals within 30 days of discovery. Regulation S-P was introduced in 2000 and controls how some financial entities must treat nonpublic personal information belonging to […]

La entrada SEC: Financial orgs have 30 days to send data breach notifications – Source: www.bleepingcomputer.com se publicó primero en CISO2CISO.COM & CYBER SECURITY GROUP.

Before yesterdayMain stream

Tornado Cash cryptomixer dev gets 64 months for laundering $2 billion – Source: www.bleepingcomputer.com

tornado-cash-cryptomixer-dev-gets-64-months-for-laundering-$2-billion-–-source:-wwwbleepingcomputer.com

Source: www.bleepingcomputer.com – Author: Bill Toulas Alexey Pertsev, one of the main developers of the Tornado Cash cryptocurrency tumbler has been sentenced to 64 months in prison for his part in helping launder more than $2 billion worth of cryptocurrency. The 31-year-old Russian national was arrested in Amsterdam in August 2022 for charges of hiding financial flows from criminal […]

La entrada Tornado Cash cryptomixer dev gets 64 months for laundering $2 billion – Source: www.bleepingcomputer.com se publicó primero en CISO2CISO.COM & CYBER SECURITY GROUP.

Nintendo issues DMCA takedown notice against over 8,500 Yuzu emulator repositories

4 May 2024 at 07:11

The notice was filed on developer platform GitHub, which Nintendo claimed housed repositories that “offer and provide access to the Yuzu emulator or code based on [it]” which “illegally circumvents Nintendo’s technological protection measures and runs illegal copies of Switch games.”

GitHub said it contacted the owners of the repositories to provide an “opportunity to make changes” before taking down the repositories, in addition to providing legal resources and information on how to file counter notices.

↫ Sophie McEvoy at GamesIndustry.biz

The legal troubles around Yuzu are a little nebulous to deal with, as there’s a lot of chatter online that Yuzu contains, or at least used, code from leaked Switch SDKs. If that is indeed true – I haven’t seen any definitive proof yet – then it makes Nintendo’s aggressiveness a lot more understandable, even for someone like me who believes emulation should be 100% legal and accessible.

US Senate passes TikTok ban bill

24 April 2024 at 13:41

A bill that would force China-based company ByteDance to sell TikTok — or else face a US ban of the platform — is all but certain to become law after the Senate passed a foreign aid package including the measure.

It now heads to President Joe Biden, who already committed to signing the TikTok legislation should it make it through both chambers of Congress. The House passed the foreign aid package that includes the TikTok bill on Saturday.

↫ Lauren Feiner at The Verge

I hope the EU follows.

U.S. Issues Visa Restrictions on Individuals Linked to Commercial Spyware

Commerical Spyware Visa Restrictions

The United States government took a significant step in countering the spread and misuse of commercial spyware. The Department of State issued visa restrictions on 13 individuals who were involved in the production and distribution of commercial spyware, as well as their immediate family members. The press statement described the individuals as benefitting financially from the controversial technology, which has been misused to target various groups such as journalists, academics, human rights defenders, dissident individuals, and U.S. government individuals.

Human Rights Violations and Counter-Intelligence Fears Cited as Justification

[caption id="attachment_64512" align="alignnone" width="1000"]Commercial Spyware , Visa Restrictions Source: Shutterstock[/caption] The policy framework to begin implementing visa restrictions was issued in February 2024 as part of Section 212 (a)(3)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken stated that the move came in response to concerns of growing global misuse of commercial spyware to enable government repression, restrict information sharing, or enable various human rights abuses. The release further described commercial spyware as threatening privacy, freedom of expression, free assembly or association. It described the technology as being linked to arbitrary detentions, forced disappearances, and extrajudicial killings in extreme cases. There was additional concern about the possibility of misusing these tools as a form of counterintelligence effort against individuals in the U.S. government as a threat to national security.

New US Government Measures Target Commercial Spyware

This visa restriction policy empowers the Department of State to enforce visa restrictions for three categories: (1) those involved in misusing commercial spyware to target individuals unlawfully, including journalists, activists, dissidents, and vulnerable populations; (2) those benefiting financially from commercial spyware, such as company directors providing spyware to governments engaging in unlawful surveillance; and (3) immediate family members of those in the first two categories(including spouses and children of any age) Last month, in March 2024 the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued sanctions on two individuals and five entities associated with commercial spyware development. In the same month, countries such as Finland, Germany, Ireland, Japan, Poland, and the Republic of Korea added themselves as participants to the ‘Joint Statement on Efforts to Counter the Proliferation and Misuse of Commercial Spyware’ with their representatives meeting in person. Last year in March 2023, the US Government issued an executive order prohibiting members of the United States Government from employing commercial spyware that may pose a risk to national security. These measures indicate that the U.S. government isn't treating the proliferation of commercial spyware lightly. Through visa and similar restrictions on associated individuals as well as joint efforts with other countries, the government aims at sending a strong message about human rights, privacy, and global security matters. Media Disclaimer: This report is based on internal and external research obtained through various means. The information provided is for reference purposes only, and users bear full responsibility for their reliance on it. The Cyber Express assumes no liability for the accuracy or consequences of using this information.

Nina Jankowicz Forms New Group to Defend Disinformation Research

The group intends to fight what its leader, Nina Jankowicz, and others have described as a coordinated campaign by conservatives and their allies to undermine researchers who study disinformation.

© Jason Andrew for The New York Times

Nina Jankowicz of the American Sunlight Project, a new advocacy group in Washington, D.C., that aims to push back against disinformation online.

EU’s new tech laws are working; small mobile browsers gain market share

10 April 2024 at 17:40

Independent browser companies in the European Union are seeing a spike in users in the first month after EU legislation forced Alphabet’s Google, Microsoft and Apple to make it easier for users to switch to rivals, according to data provided to Reuters by six companies.

The early results come after the EU’s sweeping Digital Markets Act, which aims to remove unfair competition, took effect on March 7, forcing big tech companies to offer mobile users the ability to select from a list of available web browsers from a “choice screen.”

↫ Supantha Mukherjee and Foo Yun Chee

I can’t believe this is even remotely surprising. A lot of especially Apple fans and people from outside of the European Union complained left, right, and centre about the choice screen and how it was ugly, unnecessary, and would just confuse users. These are interesting claims, considering the fact that setting up a modern smartphone such as the iPhone takes the user through 40-50 setup screens chockful of confusing choices to make, so adding one more surely wouldn’t make a difference.

Of course giving users the option to choose a different default browser would lead to an increase in browsers other than Safari (iOS) or Chrome (Android) being set as the default. I’m pretty sure quite a few users learned, through the choice screen, for the first time, that there even are different browsers to choose from, and that some of those might offer features and benefits they didn’t even know they could enjoy. That’s the whole point of this endeavour: informing users that they have a choice, something Apple, Google, and others would rather you either do not have, or at least not know about.

It’s far too early to tell if these spikes are a one-off thing, or if the rise in browsers other than Safari on iOS and Chrome on Android is more structural. I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s the latter, and even if the numbers remain in the single digits or low double digits, it will still lead to an increase in competition, and a more vibrant mobile browser market.

Good news, regardless.

❌
❌