The Cyber Express Weekly Roundup: TikTok Age Verification Probe, Healthcare Data Breach, Qantas Ruling, and Major Cyberattacks
![]()
![]()
![]()
The ClickFix attacks technique has become a key initial access method for the UAC-0145 cyber threat cluster, according to a new report from Ukraine's Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT-UA). The agency said the threat group, also tracked as Sandworm, APT44, Seashell Blizzard, and a subcluster of UAC-0002, has shifted its tactics during 2026, increasingly relying on fake CAPTCHA prompts and social engineering to compromise systems.
CERT-UA said it has worked with Ukrainian cybersecurity agencies for several years to investigate the activities of UAC-0145. While the group previously relied on infected software installers distributed through torrent websites, recent campaigns have increasingly used ClickFix to trick users into executing malicious PowerShell commands.
According to CERT-UA, infections recorded during the spring and summer of 2026 frequently began when victims visited compromised websites displaying fake CAPTCHA pages. Users were instructed to copy and execute PowerShell commands in their terminal, a phishing technique commonly referred to as ClickFix.
The downloaded commands were designed to retrieve malicious files such as GHETTOVIBE, a Visual Basic Script (VBS) that establishes persistence by placing itself in the Windows Startup directory.
Once executed, attackers could deploy SCOUTCURL, a PowerShell reconnaissance tool capable of collecting information about the compromised system, including device specifications, installed software, browser data, and local files before exfiltrating the information.
CERT-UA also observed malware loaders including FLUIDLEECH, disguised as antivirus software, and LOADLOOP being used during these campaigns.
The report noted that attackers continue using malware families such as KALAMBUR, SUMBUR, and TAMBUR after gaining access to victim systems.
To maintain remote access, the group relied on legitimate utilities including OpenSSH and Tor, forwarding local network ports such as 445, 3389, and 22 to attacker-controlled infrastructure.
CERT-UA also found malware designed to steal messaging data from Signal and WhatsApp, with stolen information reportedly exfiltrated using RSYNC.
On infected systems examined during cyber defense operations, investigators additionally identified FREAKYPOLL, a Python-based backdoor distributed as compiled bytecode (.pyc), providing attackers with persistent unauthorized access.
During June and July 2026, CERT-UA analyzed more than ten compromised websites involved in ClickFix attacks.
Investigators found attackers using both the Cloaking.House service and custom malware called SMARTAXE to dynamically modify legitimate webpages. SMARTAXE retrieves remote domains from blockchain smart contracts through Ethereum's eth_call function before displaying fake CAPTCHA pages or redirecting visitors to malicious content.
CERT-UA warned that any website used in these attacks should be considered compromised, potentially through vulnerable content management systems (CMS), stolen credentials, web shells, malicious plugins, modified website scripts, or server-side backdoors.
The agency urged website administrators and hosting providers to strengthen website security and respond quickly to incident reports.
The report also highlighted growing use of Android malware distributed through messaging applications.
Attackers were observed sharing APK files disguised as security or antivirus tools. One such malware family, tracked as COWARDDUCK, functions as a full-featured Android backdoor capable of collecting device information, contacts, files, and real-time geolocation.
The malware targets files from directories including DCIM, Documents, Downloads, Pictures, and Alarms while searching for formats such as DOCX, XLSX, PPTX, ZIP, RAR, JSON, and OVPN files.
According to CERT-UA, COWARDDUCK uploads stolen files through the Dropbox API while receiving commands from legitimate services including Steam Community and StockMemory domains through proxy infrastructure.
Microsoft Threat Intelligence and Microsoft Defender Experts also reported that ClickFix campaigns have increased significantly since early 2024, targeting thousands of enterprise and consumer devices globally each day.
Microsoft said the technique commonly delivers malware such as Lumma Stealer by persuading users to copy and execute commands through Windows Run, Windows Terminal, or Windows PowerShell. The campaigns are often combined with phishing, malvertising, and drive-by compromise techniques that imitate trusted brands.
Because ClickFix attacks rely on user interaction rather than exploiting software vulnerabilities directly, Microsoft recommends organizations strengthen user awareness and apply security policies that restrict unnecessary use of command execution tools.
![]()
![]()
![]()
The UK's communications regulator has launched a formal investigation into TikTok age verification, raising questions over whether the platform is adequately protecting children online under the country's Online Safety Act. The move comes as Britain prepares to introduce a social media ban for under-16s, with regulators warning that current age assurance methods used by some platforms may not be sufficient to prevent children from accessing harmful content.
The investigation follows the publication of a new Ofcom report that found age checks are becoming more common across online services, but significant gaps remain, particularly on social media platforms and some pornography websites.
According to Ofcom, some social media companies rely primarily on age inference methods to identify child users. These systems estimate a user's age based on their online behavior rather than verifying it directly.
The regulator said it has "serious doubts" about whether these methods are capable of meeting the standards required under the Online Safety Act. Ofcom believes some companies may be failing to correctly identify a significant number of children, potentially exposing them to harmful content, including pornography, self-harm, and suicide-related material.
As a result, Ofcom has launched a formal investigation into whether TikTok is complying with its legal duties to protect children from harmful content.
The regulator also warned that age inference alone will not be considered sufficient for enforcing the government's planned restrictions on social media use by children under 16. Platforms using such methods have been urged to adopt more effective age assurance technologies or provide compelling evidence demonstrating their effectiveness.
The report found significant progress in the adoption of age checks since the Online Safety Act's child protection duties came into force in July 2025.
Between July 2025 and January 2026, the proportion of children encountering highly effective age checks increased from 25% to 43%.
Ofcom said more than 69 million age checks were completed across a sample of 32 UK services during the second half of 2025, representing a 23-fold increase compared to the previous six months.
The regulator also reported that all of the UK's top 10 pornography websites and most of the top 100 now have age verification measures in place.
Among children aged 8 to 14 who attempted to access pornography, only 8% visited such services. Half of those children reached only websites with age checks, while nearly 87% of their visits lasted less than 30 seconds, suggesting age verification discouraged continued access.
Despite the wider rollout of age assurance, Ofcom found that children can still easily discover pornography websites without age checks through Google Search and Bing.
Its analysis found that 33% of first-page Google search results and 54% of Bing results directed users to pornography websites lacking age verification or equivalent protections.
Following discussions with the regulator, Google and Bing have agreed to work with Ofcom on practical measures to reduce the visibility of such websites in search results.
Meanwhile, Ofcom continues enforcement against adult services that fail to comply with the law. The regulator has opened 23 investigations involving 88 adult service providers, with many either introducing age assurance or blocking UK users after enforcement action.
The investigation comes as the UK government advances plans to introduce a social media ban for under-16s, modeled on Australia's approach.
Under the proposal, platforms including TikTok, Snapchat, Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, and X would be prohibited from offering social media services to users under 16. Messaging services such as WhatsApp and Signal are not expected to be included.
The government also plans to introduce additional protections, including restrictions on livestreaming and communication with strangers for children under 16 across social media and certain gaming platforms. Similar safeguards would apply by default to users aged 16 and 17 to avoid what officials describe as a "cliff-edge" at age 16.
The proposed measures are expected to be presented to Parliament before the end of the year, with implementation targeted for Spring 2027.
Ofcom said it will submit a rapid assessment to Parliament by the end of October outlining what constitutes highly effective age assurance for verifying whether someone is over 16, helping shape future enforcement of the planned restrictions.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
A vishing call to an overseas contact center agent. A fake IT ticket. A default setting nobody thought to lock down. That's all it took to expose the personal data of roughly 5 million Australians — and now the country's privacy regulator has decided Qantas isn't to blame for it.
The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) closed the book this week on its year-long preliminary inquiry into the June 2025 Qantas data breach, and the conclusion cuts against the instinct to punish the victim of a cyberattack.
According to the OAIC's report, the evidence gathered did not indicate a likelihood that Qantas had "failed" to take reasonable steps to protect the personal information it held, nor that it failed to ensure its overseas third-party provider complied with Australia's privacy principles. No investigation. No enforcement action.
"After more than a year of making inquiries and obtaining information on the data breach, we're satisfied that the evidence does not support the likelihood that a breach of privacy law occurred. As a result, we've decided not to commence a full investigation of Qantas at this stage." - Carly Kind, Australian Privacy Commissioner.
The breach traces back to a single phone call. A threat actor posing as "Qantas IT help" convinced a contact center agent to visit a website tied to the customer relationship management platform used by Qantas agents, walking them through steps framed as necessary to close an IT support ticket. That interaction connected the agent's CRM session to a data extraction tool controlled by the attacker, who then pulled data from every contact profile the agent could access. It was pure social engineering — no malware, no exploited vulnerability, just a convincing lie.
Qantas caught it fast. A staff member spotted an unusual spike in login-attempt alerts on the morning of June 30, two days after the call, and escalated it to the cybersecurity team. Within hours, the company had frozen the compromised account, assessed for data exfiltration, and triggered its incident response process. Public disclosure followed on July 2.
The regulator's numbers are more precise than what circulated publicly last year. Roughly 5.67 million customer records were compromised, with about 4 million exposing names, phone numbers, email addresses and Frequent Flyer details, and a further 1.7 million records including combinations of home or business addresses, dates of birth, gender and meal preferences. Critically, no credit card numbers, financial information or passport details lived on the compromised platform, and customer passwords and login credentials were never touched.
The OAIC's reasoning is a rare, explicit acknowledgment that good controls don't guarantee immunity. Investigators found that social engineering training generally targets credential theft, not the rarer tactic of talking an employee into authorizing a legitimate-looking system connection — meaning the attack likely would have succeeded even with standard training in place. They also noted the flaw was structural: a default configuration let the agent authorize a third-party app connection, a setting the CRM vendor has since changed for all its customers.
Commissioner Carly Kind put the broader stakes plainly in the OAIC's statement announcing the report, warning that AI-driven threats are only raising the bar. As she framed it, agentic and advanced AI will keep escalating the cybersecurity risks businesses face, making continuous review of security posture non-negotiable — not optional.
“Data breaches are a persistent feature of today’s digital world, and can occur despite organisations taking steps to protect personal information,” Commissioner Carly said. “Agentic and advanced AI will only increase the cybersecurity risks that businesses face, and it is critical that all organisations continuously review and enhance their security to protect against this growing threat.”The takeaway here isn't that Qantas got a pass. It's that a regulator has now drawn, in writing, the line between negligence and the limits of what training and access controls can realistically stop.
![]()
![]()
A major global crypto investment scam investigation has led to the arrest of an alleged key figure behind an international criminal organization accused of defrauding victims of more than €100 million every month. Dutch police announced multiple arrests across Europe following a long-running investigation into a fraud network that allegedly employed over 700 people operating from around 20 call centers worldwide.
The main suspect, a 46-year-old dual Israeli and Polish national, was arrested at an airport in Poland on May 26 at the request of Dutch authorities. Investigators believe he played an indispensable role in the organization, which allegedly carried out large-scale investment fraud targeting victims across multiple countries.
According to Dutch police, the organization functioned like a professional company with approximately 700 employees spread across nearly 20 offices globally. Individuals working as financial advisors scam operators allegedly contacted victims daily through online platforms and telephone calls while posing as legitimate investment professionals.
Authorities said the organization was structured with a central headquarters overseeing multiple teams, each assigned to target victims in specific countries. Employees reportedly worked under pseudonyms and used technical measures to hide their identities and locations.
![]()
As part of the investigation, Belgian police arrested five individuals believed to have worked as fraudulent financial advisors.
The investigation resulted in several coordinated arrests during May and July.
On July 7, authorities arrested two Dutch nationals aged 45 and 34, along with a 34-year-old Belgian, all residing in Cyprus. A 25-year-old suspect was also arrested in Belgium the same day. On July 10, police arrested a 44-year-old Dutch national in Athens.
The main suspect has since been extradited to the Netherlands, where an examining magistrate ordered 14 days of pre-trial detention. Dutch authorities indicated that additional arrests remain possible as the investigation continues.
Investigators said the online investment scam relied on building long-term trust with victims. Individuals posing as account managers or financial advisors maintained frequent contact through phone calls and online communication, sometimes over several months.
Victims were encouraged to begin with relatively small investments that appeared to generate immediate returns. Police said the investment platforms displayed convincing but fabricated profits, even though no actual investments were being made.
As confidence grew, victims were persuaded to transfer increasingly larger amounts, often in the form of cryptocurrency fraud payments. Instead of being invested, investigators said the funds were diverted directly to the criminal organization.
Authorities also warned that victims who stop investing may later be contacted by so-called recovery companies requesting upfront deposits to recover lost funds. Police believe these recovery operations may also be connected to the same fraud networks.
Dutch authorities have received approximately 550 reports connected to the organization, while Belgian police have recorded around 200 complaints. Investigators estimate the total number of victims worldwide could reach tens of thousands.
The financial losses reported by victims in the Netherlands alone amount to nearly €25 million, with many individuals losing well over €10,000.
Dutch police said officers proactively contacted some victims after discovering that many remained unaware they had fallen victim to cyber fraud.
Financial investigators are now examining whether assets linked to the suspects can be frozen or seized.
Investigators said the criminal organization remained active since at least 2021 and relied heavily on concealed digital infrastructure to evade law enforcement.
By tracing financial transactions, IP addresses, and other digital evidence, the Dutch police identified offices, suspects, and critical infrastructure supporting the operation. Authorities worked with commercial service providers to take key elements of the network offline.
The investigation also involved Europol, with intelligence shared across multiple countries to support ongoing criminal prosecutions.
Officials said the case demonstrates the scale and sophistication of modern investment fraud operations and highlighted continued international cooperation to dismantle cyber-enabled financial crime networks.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Australia and India have unveiled the Australia-India PACTS, a new framework designed to deepen bilateral cooperation on cybersecurity, critical technologies, supply chain resilience, digital resilience, and defence research.
The new partnership replaces the 2020 Framework Arrangement on Cyber and Cyber Enabled Critical Technology Cooperation and aims to strengthen national security, economic growth, and regional stability across the Indo-Pacific.
The two countries said the Australia-India Partnership on Cyber, Critical Technologies and Supply Chains (PACTS) builds on two decades of research collaboration, operational coordination, and policy engagement. It also reflects their shared commitment to creating secure digital ecosystems while promoting trusted technology partnerships.
The Australia-India PACTS is structured around five pillars that will drive collaboration between governments, research institutions, universities, and the private sector. The framework is intended to increase two-way investment in emerging technologies while supporting innovation and the commercialisation of research.
The first pillar focuses on supply chain resilience by strengthening trusted technology supply chains and promoting secure trade. Both countries will establish a bilateral mechanism for trusted vendor frameworks and work together to improve undersea cable security through the Quad Partnership for Cable Connectivity and Resilience. The partnership also includes collaboration on semiconductor research, critical minerals, and trade diversification.
The second pillar focuses on critical technologies, with Australia and India planning to strengthen cooperation in artificial intelligence, telecommunications, biotechnology, advanced materials, and space technologies.
The framework also supports the development of international standards for trustworthy AI and encourages collaboration between academic institutions and industry to promote responsible AI deployment. The two countries will also explore joint research, investment initiatives, and commercial partnerships in emerging technologies to strengthen long-term economic security across the Indo-Pacific.
A major component of the partnership is Australia India cybersecurity cooperation. Under the third pillar, both governments will work together to counter cybercrime, deter malicious cyber activity, strengthen cyber policy coordination, and protect critical infrastructure.
The framework proposes a consolidated bilateral mechanism for cyber and ICT cooperation, expanded engagement in United Nations cyber processes, increased trade opportunities for cybersecurity businesses, and practical workshops involving government agencies and industry stakeholders.
The partnership will also establish a cyber technology skills incubator to promote knowledge exchange and workforce development.
The fourth pillar focuses on digital resilience across the Indo-Pacific. Australia and India will collaborate on trusted Digital Public Infrastructure initiatives and promote scalable digital solutions that support connectivity, healthcare, education, renewable energy, critical infrastructure, and digital transformation.
The partnership also seeks to expand pilot projects that help countries across the region build adaptable digital ecosystems while strengthening regional capabilities.
The fifth pillar strengthens defence science collaboration through joint research, innovation partnerships, and greater engagement between Australia's Defence Science and Technology Group and India's Defence Research and Development Organisation.
Areas of cooperation include maritime surveillance, advanced materials, defence innovation, and stronger links between defence start-up ecosystems.
The Australia-India PACTS will be jointly overseen by the Australian Deputy Secretary of the International and Security Group within the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet and the Indian Deputy National Security Advisor. Annual Senior Officials Meetings will review progress, assess emerging cyber and technology risks, and identify future collaborative projects under each pillar.
With the launch of Australia-India Partnership on Cyber, Critical Technologies and Supply Chains (PACTS), both countries have outlined a long-term roadmap that brings together cybersecurity, critical technologies, supply chain resilience, digital resilience, and defence cooperation under a single strategic framework aimed at strengthening security and technology collaboration across the Indo-Pacific.