Senators Investigate Role of A.I. Data Centers in Rising Electricity Costs

© Nathan Howard for The New York Times

© Nathan Howard for The New York Times

© Brittany Greeson for The New York Times

© Haiyun Jiang for The New York Times

ServiceNow Inc. is in advanced talks to acquire cybersecurity startup Armis in a deal that could reach $7 billion, its largest ever, according to reports. Bloomberg News first reported the discussions over the weekend, noting that an announcement could come within days. However, sources cautioned that the deal could still collapse or attract competing bidders...
The post ServiceNow in Advanced Talks to Acquire Armis for $7 Billion: Reports appeared first on Security Boulevard.
Technology professionals hoping to come and work in the US face a new privacy concern. Starting December 15, skilled workers on H-1B visas and their families must flip their social media profiles to public before their consular interviews. It’s a deeply risky move from a security and privacy perspective.
According to a missive from the US State Department, immigration officers use all available information to vet newcomers for signs that they pose a threat to national security. That includes an “online presence review.” That review now requires not just H-1B applicants but also H-4 applicants (their dependents who want to move with them to the US) to “adjust the privacy settings on all of their social media profiles to ‘public.'”
An internal State Department cable obtained by CBS had sharper language: it instructs officers to screen for “any indications of hostility toward the citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles of the United States.” What that means is unclear, but if your friends like posting strong political opinions, you should be worried.
This isn’t the first time that the government has forced people to lift the curtain on their private digital lives. The US State Department forced student visa applicants to make their social media profiles public in June this year.
This is a big deal for a lot of people. The H-1B program allows companies to temporarily hire foreign workers in specialty jobs. The US processed around 400,000 visas under the H-1B program last year, most of which were applications to renew employment, according to the Pew Research Center. When you factor in those workers’ dependents, we’re talking well over a million people. This decision forces them into long-term digital exposure that threatens not just them, but the US too.
A lot of these H-1B workers work for defense contractors, chip makers, AI labs, and big tech companies. These are organizations that foreign powers (especially those hostile to the US) care a lot about, and that makes those H-1B employees primary targets for them.
Making H-1B holders’ real names, faces, and daily routines public is a form of digital doxxing. The policy exposes far more personal information than is safe, creating significant new risks.
This information gives these actors a free organizational chart, complete with up-to-date information on who’s likely to be working on chip designs and sensitive software.
It also gives the same people all they need to target people on that chart. They have information on H-1B holders and their dependents, including intelligence about their friends and family, their interests, their regular locations, and even what kinds of technology they use. They become more exposed to risks like SIM swapping and swatting.
This public information also turns employees into organizational attack vectors. Adversaries can use personal and professional data to enhance spear-phishing and business email compromise techniques that cost organizations dearly. Public social media content becomes training data for fraud, serving up audio and video that threat actors can use to create lifelike impersonations of company employees.
Social media profiles also give adversaries an ideal way to approach people. They have a nasty habit of exploiting social media to target assets for recruitment. The head of MI5 warned two years ago that Chinese state actors had approached an estimated 20,000 Britons via LinkedIn to steal industrial or technological secrets.
Armed with a deep, intimate understanding of what makes their targets tick, attackers stand a much better chance of co-opting them. One person might need money because of a gambling problem or a sick relative. Another might be lonely and a perfect target for a romance scam.
Or how about basic extortion? LGBTQ+ individuals from countries where homosexuality is criminalized risk exposure to regimes that could harm them when they return. Family in hostile countries become bargaining chips. In some regions, families of high-value employees could face increased exposure if this information becomes accessible. Foreign nation states are good at exploiting pain points. This policy means that they won’t have to look far for them.
Visa applications might assume they can simply make an account private again once officials have evaluated them. But adversary states to the US are actively seeking such information. They have vast online surveillance operations that scrape public social media accounts. As soon as they notice someone showing up in the US with H-1B visa status, they’ll be ready to mine account data that they’ve already scraped.
So what is an H-1B applicant to do? Deleting accounts is a bad idea, because sudden disappearance can trigger suspicion and officers may detect forensic traces. A safer approach is to pause new posting and carefully review older content before making profiles public. Removing or hiding posts that reveal personal routines, locations, or sensitive opinions reduces what can be taken out of context or used for targeting once accounts are exposed.
The irony is that spies are likely using fake social media accounts honed for years to slip under the radar. That means they’ll keep operating in the dark while legitimate H-1B applicants are the ones who become vulnerable. So this policy may unintentionally create the very risks it aims to prevent. And it also normalizes mandatory public exposure as a condition of government interaction.
We’re at a crossroads. Today, visa applicants, their families, and their employers are at risk. The infrastructure exists to expand this approach in the future. Or officials could stop now and rethink, before these risks become more deeply entrenched.
We don’t just report on threats – we help protect your social media
Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. Protect your social media accounts by using Malwarebytes Identity Theft Protection.

© Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times

© Loren Elliott for The New York Times
Announcement draws anger from Labour MP over refusal to remove tonnes of rubbish dumped near school in Wigan
The Environment Agency is to spend millions of pounds to clear an enormous illegal rubbish dump in Oxfordshire, saying the waste is at risk of catching fire.
But the decision announced on Thursday to clear up the thousands of tonnes of waste illegally dumped outside Kidlington has drawn an angry response from a Labour MP in Greater Manchester whose constituents have been living alongside 25,000 tonnes of toxic rubbish for nearly a year.
Continue reading...
© Photograph: Jacob King/PA

© Photograph: Jacob King/PA

© Photograph: Jacob King/PA

© Erin Schaff/The New York Times
Read more of this story at Slashdot.

© Doug Mills/The New York Times

© Jon Cherry/Reuters
Warwickshire board says maximum 5% tax rise needed for financial viability despite election promise to cut costs
Reform UK council leaders have been accused of making “rash promises” after a local authority led by the party has been told it will have to increase council tax by the maximum amount, despite its election promises to cut costs.
Warwickshire county council has been warned by its executives that anything less than a 5% maximum council tax increase will put its financial viability at risk.
Continue reading...
© Photograph: Colin Underhill/Alamy

© Photograph: Colin Underhill/Alamy

© Photograph: Colin Underhill/Alamy

© Monicah Mwangi/Reuters
Andy Burnham unveils next step in transport system, allowing contactless travel with fares capped across trains, buses and trams
The first passenger trains in the Bee Network will join by the end of 2026, after Greater Manchester disclosed the next steps in its ambitious transport system.
Unveiling a yellow-branded Northern train, the regional mayor, Andy Burnham, said two lines from central Manchester – to Glossop and Stalybridge – would join the network in a year, allowing contactless travel with fares capped across trains, buses and trams.
Continue reading...
© Photograph: Transport for Greater Manchester

© Photograph: Transport for Greater Manchester

© Photograph: Transport for Greater Manchester

© Cheriss May for The New York Times

© Pete Kiehart for The New York Times

© Bridget Bennett/Reuters
Roy Marsh, 86, says the penalty from enforcement officers was ‘unnecessary and all out of proportion’
A man has claimed he was fined £250 for spitting after a leaf blew into his mouth in Lincolnshire.
Roy Marsh, 86, was given the financial penalty after the incident in Skegness earlier this year. He is now calling for “responsible” litter enforcement.
Continue reading...
© Photograph: Jane Marsh Fitzpatrick

© Photograph: Jane Marsh Fitzpatrick

© Photograph: Jane Marsh Fitzpatrick

© Janie Osborne for The New York Times

© Lam Yik Fei for The New York Times
Read more of this story at Slashdot.

© Sophie Park for The New York Times

© Laure Andrillon/Reuters

© Sophie Park for The New York Times
Read more of this story at Slashdot.

© Pete Marovich for The New York Times
Worcestershire council leader Jo Monk sent city councillor Ed Kimberley a cease and desist letter over his criticism of her
The leader of a Reform UK-run local authority has been criticised for an “authoritarian” attempt to silence opposition after sending a legal threat to a Labour councillor, demanding he stops mentioning her name in public.
Ed Kimberley, a Worcester city councillor, said he received the cease and desist letter from the leader of Worcestershire county council, Jo Monk, in late November.
Continue reading...
© Photograph: Reform UK

© Photograph: Reform UK

© Photograph: Reform UK

© Al Drago for The New York Times

© Victor J. Blue for The New York Times

© Alex Welsh for The New York Times

© Edgar Su/Reuters

© Eric Lee for The New York Times
In cybersecurity today, regulation is everywhere, but resilience isn’t keeping pace.
In this episode of Experts on Experts: Commanding Perspectives, Craig Adams chats with Sabeen Malik, VP of Public Policy & Government Affairs at Rapid7, about what’s broken (and what’s promising) in today’s regulatory landscape.
Sabeen pulls from her experience across diplomacy, operations, and government relations to highlight where policy too often fails to account for how risk actually works. From insider threats to government shutdowns, it’s a sharp, timely look at how security leaders should approach strategy, structure, and compliance going into 2026.
The growing trust gap between public, private, and institutional actors
Why insider threats are a cultural problem, not just a controls one
Where UK and US guidance is falling short on resilience
What small and midsized businesses are still missing
Why AI, exposure, and threat governance need to be connected
Whether you're thinking about AI use cases or modern regulation fatigue, this episode offers a much-needed reset.


© Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times

© Doug Mills/The New York Times

© Tierney L. Cross/The New York Times

© The New York Times

© Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
Read more of this story at Slashdot.

© Tierney L. Cross/The New York Times

© Mark Harris

© Andre Penner/Associated Press

© Hannah Beier for The New York Times

© Desiree Rios for The New York Times

© Drew Angerer/Getty Images

© Eli Hartman/Reuters

© Helen Sessions/Alamy