❌

Reading view

↗️

The Burnout Nobody Talks About: When “Always-On” Leadership Becomes a Liability

✇Security Boulevard
By:Steve

In cybersecurity, being “always on” is often treated like a badge of honor.

We celebrate the leaders who respond at all hours, who jump into every incident, who never seem to unplug. Availability gets confused with commitment. Urgency gets mistaken for effectiveness. And somewhere along the way, exhaustion becomes normalized—if not quietly admired.

But here’s the uncomfortable truth:

Always-on leadership doesn’t scale. And over time, it becomes a liability.

I’ve seen it firsthand, and if you’ve spent any real time in high-pressure security environments, you probably have too.

The Myth of Constant Availability

Cybersecurity is unforgiving. Threats don’t wait for business hours. Incidents don’t respect calendars. That reality creates a subtle but dangerous expectation: real leaders are always reachable.

The problem isn’t short-term intensity. The problem is when intensity becomes an identity.

When leaders feel compelled to be everywhere, all the time, a few things start to happen:

  • Decision quality quietly degrades

  • Teams become dependent instead of empowered

  • Strategic thinking gets crowded out by reactive work

From the outside, it can look like dedication. From the inside, it often feels like survival mode.

And survival mode is a terrible place to lead from.

What Burnout Actually Costs

Burnout isn’t just about being tired. It’s about losing margin—mental, emotional, and strategic margin.

Leaders without margin:

  • Default to familiar solutions instead of better ones

  • React instead of anticipate

  • Solve today’s problem at the expense of tomorrow’s resilience

In cybersecurity, that’s especially dangerous. This field demands clarity under pressure, judgment amid noise, and the ability to zoom out when everything is screaming “zoom in.”

When leaders are depleted, those skills are the first to go.

Strong Leaders Don’t Do Everything—They Design Systems

One of the biggest mindset shifts I’ve seen in effective leaders is this:

They stop trying to be the system and start building one.

That means:

  • Creating clear decision boundaries so teams don’t need constant escalation

  • Trusting people with ownership, not just tasks

  • Designing escalation paths that protect focus instead of destroying it

This isn’t about disengaging. It’s about leading intentionally.

Ironically, the leaders who are least available at all times are often the ones whose teams perform best—because the system works even when they step away.

Presence Beats Availability

There’s a difference between being reachable and being present.

Presence is about:

  • Showing up fully when it matters

  • Making thoughtful decisions instead of fast ones

  • Modeling sustainable behavior for teams that are already under pressure

When leaders never disconnect, they send a message—even if unintentionally—that rest is optional and boundaries are weakness. Over time, that culture burns people out long before the threat landscape does.

Good leaders protect their teams.

Great leaders also protect their own capacity to lead.

A Different Measure of Leadership

In a field obsessed with uptime, response times, and coverage, it’s worth asking a harder question:

If I stepped away for a week, would things fall apart—or function as designed?

If the answer is “fall apart,” that’s not a personal failure. It’s a leadership signal. One that points to opportunity, not inadequacy.

The strongest leaders I know aren’t always on.

They’re intentional. They’re disciplined. And they understand that long-term effectiveness requires more than endurance—it requires self-mastery.

In cybersecurity especially, that might be the most underrated leadership skill of all.

#

References & Resources

The post The Burnout Nobody Talks About: When “Always-On” Leadership Becomes a Liability appeared first on Security Boulevard.

  •  
  • ↗️