Normal view

Received yesterday — 13 February 2026

Keir Starmer to call on UK and Europe to step up commitments to Nato

British PM to tell Munich Security Conference that Europe together is ‘sleeping giant’ and will say UK won’t turn away from its allies

Keir Starmer will say the UK and Europe need to step up their commitments to Nato and avoid the risk of overdependence on the US for defence, as he sets out one of the main planks of his foreign policy vision on Saturday.

Speaking at the Munich Security Conference, the prime minister will warn against the idea of the UK turning inwards on security, instead calling for a focus on what he will call the “sleeping giant” of shared European defence capabilities.

Continue reading...

© Photograph: Stefan Rousseau/Reuters

© Photograph: Stefan Rousseau/Reuters

© Photograph: Stefan Rousseau/Reuters

The Guardian view on Starmer’s trust crisis: it is unlikely to be managed away | Editorial

13 February 2026 at 13:30

At a moment of stagnation and political drift, Andy Burnham’s push for a new plan suggests the centre-left debate has moved beyond Downing Street

Once a political leader’s net favourability sinks deep into negative territory, recovery is the exception, not the rule. It usually takes an economic rebound, a dramatic political reset or an opposition implosion to reverse the slide. Sir Keir Starmer’s personal ratings are in a danger zone from which few escape.

Yet the prime minister, like the Bourbons, has learnt nothing and forgotten nothing. He made a speech this week after coming close to being ousted suggesting he would “fight” on. He doubled down in parliament despite glaring errors in judgment. He forced out his cabinet secretary while his own failures remain unaddressed. He seemed to blame everyone but himself. When support slips and a leader answers with defiance, voters don’t see strength – they see denial.

Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.

Continue reading...

© Photograph: Adam Vaughan/EPA

© Photograph: Adam Vaughan/EPA

© Photograph: Adam Vaughan/EPA

Starmer condemns Reform UK’s ‘racist rhetoric’ – UK politics live

13 February 2026 at 08:33

PM says country’s discourse is being poisoned and polluted by rhetoric ‘pitting communities against one another’

The Equality and Human Rights Commission has welcomed a high court ruling defending the interim guidance it issued to organisations about the implications of the supreme court judgement saying that, when the Equality Act refers to sex, it means biological sex.

The guidance – described as an “interim update” – was controversial because it was seen as over-prescriptive, and the Good Law Project launched a legal challenge.

We welcome the court’s conclusion that the interim update was lawful and the EHRC did not act in breach of its statutory duties.

We issued the interim update in response to a high level of demand immediately after the supreme court’s ruling. We were concerned that organisations and individuals could be subject to misinformation and misrepresentation of the judgment and its consequences. That might have led to them failing to comply with the law: adopting or maintaining discriminatory policies or practices, to the detriment of those the law is supposed to protect.

It is wrong because it reduces trans people to a third sex. It is wrong because it gives little or no weight to the harm done to trans people by excluding them. And it is wrong because it is not interested enough in the rights of people who are trans to keep their status private.

The tragic irony for [Morgan] McSweeney [Starmer’s chief of staff until Sunday] was that Starmer’s 18 months as prime minister have only vindicated Blair’s central analysis of their project. McSweeney and Starmer might have identified what they disliked most about the excesses of New Labour, but they never developed an alternative political economy of their own that might replace it. In place of Blairism there was no theory of political reform or coherent critique of British state failure, no analysis of Britain’s future place in the world or any kind of distinct moral mission. All there was was a promise to “clean things up” as Starmer put it to me. The mission became, in essence, conservative: to protect the settlement erected by Blair and eroded over the 20 years since his departure. Britain could thrive if it could only begin to live within its means, attract more foreign investment, reassure the bond markets and return a sense of “service” to government. After years of chaos, mere stability would be change. And this would be enough.

Where there was distinct radicalism – from McSweeney’s Blue Labour instincts – there was no mandate. McSweeney and Starmer had not fought an ideological battle to bring Blue Labour to government, as Wilson had done for socialist modernisation in the 1960s and Blair for liberal progressivism 30 years later. This was largely because Starmer never really believed in it in the first place and McSweeney, though a reflective thinker, was always more of an operator than political theorist. And so, the pair offered a programme without a programme, a government without ideas or the mandate to enact them.

Another of those who worked for [Stamer] adds: ‘He’s completely incurious. He’s not interested in policy or politics. He thinks his job is to sit in a room and be serious, be presented with something and say “Yes” or “No” – invariably “Yes” – rather than be persuader–in-chief.’ Even before he fell out with Starmer, Mandelson told friends and colleagues that the Prime Minister had never once asked him ‘What really makes Trump tick?’ or ‘How will he react to this?’.

Others dispute the claim of incuriosity. ‘There are subjects when he drills down and he’s really, really good,’ says another aide. ‘The idea he can’t think politically is also wrong. He will often think ahead.’ But even these loyalists admit Starmer lacks a ‘philosophical worldview’.

Continue reading...

© Photograph: Suzanne Plunkett/Reuters

© Photograph: Suzanne Plunkett/Reuters

© Photograph: Suzanne Plunkett/Reuters

Left or right, Keir? Labour factions jostle for influence in post-McSweeney No 10

Soft left senses chance to push Starmer into progressive pivot, but leftward turn would be fiercely resisted by some

As the prime minister fought for his political life before Labour MPs at their Monday evening meeting, even hardened sceptics saw a flash of something different in Keir Starmer.

Ed Miliband, the energy secretary, said Starmer had been “liberated”. He did not have to spell out who from. His comments came 24 hours after the departure of Starmer’s chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, a man who has shaped Labour’s modern incarnation.

Continue reading...

© Photograph: House Of Commons/AFP/Getty Images

© Photograph: House Of Commons/AFP/Getty Images

© Photograph: House Of Commons/AFP/Getty Images

After a mad week, Labour is hopefully seeing sense: Starmer needs to stay | Simon Jenkins

13 February 2026 at 07:00

The only winners from a political coup in Westminster would be Labour’s enemies on the left and right

They roared, they stamped and they cheered. On Monday, the parliamentary Labour party reacted as it should when its leader hit a spot of bother. It knew it could not sack him, so it backed him. The constitution did its job and parliament supported the elected government of the day.

The idea that what Britain most needs is a Downing Street conflict is madness. After a week of a truly almighty storm in a teacup, it was a relief that the Commons could recover and steady the ship of state. It should keep it that way into the immediate future.

Simon Jenkins is a Guardian columnist and the author of A Short History of America: From Tea Party to Trump

Continue reading...

© Photograph: House of Commons

© Photograph: House of Commons

© Photograph: House of Commons

Received before yesterday

Starmer ousts cabinet secretary in clear-out of top team after Mandelson scandal

12 February 2026 at 14:44

Chris Wormald steps down ‘by mutual consent’ after a year in post with Antonia Romeo expected to succeed him

Keir Starmer’s attempt to shake up his top team after the disastrous Peter Mandelson scandal began on Thursday, when he forced out his most senior civil servant with a view to replacing him with Antonia Romeo.

The prime minister announced that Chris Wormald was stepping down “by mutual consent” after just over a year as cabinet secretary, with Romeo almost certain to succeed him as the first woman in the job.

Continue reading...

© Photograph: ZUMA Press, Inc./Alamy Stock Photo/Alamy Live News.

© Photograph: ZUMA Press, Inc./Alamy Stock Photo/Alamy Live News.

© Photograph: ZUMA Press, Inc./Alamy Stock Photo/Alamy Live News.

Union chief calls for Angela Rayner to replace Keir Starmer or risk Labour defeat to Reform UK

12 February 2026 at 13:01

Exclusive: TSSA general secretary wants Rayner to take over after Gorton byelection which she expects party to lose

The head of a Labour-affiliated union has called for Angela Rayner to replace Keir Starmer, warning that Starmer risks leading the party into a heavy election defeat to Nigel Farage’s Reform UK.

Maryam Eslamdoust, the general secretary of the Transport Salaried Staffs’ Association (TSSA), told the Guardian she wanted the former deputy prime minister to take charge after this month’s Gorton and Denton byelection.

Continue reading...

© Photograph: Phil Noble/Reuters

© Photograph: Phil Noble/Reuters

© Photograph: Phil Noble/Reuters

Zombie Labour: Starmer staggers on – podcast

After a week when it seemed all but over for Keir Starmer, John, Pippa and Kiran unpack how the prime minister survived – and what it means for Labour in the long run

Continue reading...

© Photograph: Andrew Matthews/PA

© Photograph: Andrew Matthews/PA

© Photograph: Andrew Matthews/PA

‘Jellyfish’ and ‘doormat’: why is Keir Starmer so deeply unpopular?

From his public persona to a sense that he sold the country a pup, many factors seem to feed a sense of ‘great dislike’

In yet another confusing and chaotic period for British politics there is one thing on which just about everyone can agree: Keir Starmer is unpopular. Very, very unpopular.

His net favourability rating, the difference between those who have a generally positive or negative view of the prime minister has been, depending on the pollster, anything from -50 to -57, a nadir only beaten by Liz Truss. Recent focus group descriptions of Starmer include a “jellyfish” and a “doormat”.

Continue reading...

© Photograph: Andy Rain/EPA

© Photograph: Andy Rain/EPA

© Photograph: Andy Rain/EPA

Behold the incredible shrinking Starmer: the PM who promises more while giving less | Aditya Chakrabortty

12 February 2026 at 01:00

It is not just this doomed government but the Labour party itself that is disappearing before our very eyes

When he does go, what will the political death certificate give as the true cause of Keir Starmer’s demise? It won’t be the Peter Mandelson scandal, the policy U-turns or the bleak nights at provincial counting centres. All these are symptoms, not the disease. No, what is turning the guy elected just 19 months ago into an ex-prime minister is the slow realisation among ministers, colleagues and voters of one essential truth about the man: there is less to him than meets the eye.

His promises get shrunk in the wash. A green new deal is jettisoned, an Employment Rights Act has a large watering can poured over it, a bold manifesto pledge to end Britain’s feudal leasehold laws suddenly grows caveats.

Aditya Chakrabortty is a Guardian columnist

Continue reading...

© Illustration: Danielle Rhoda/The Guardian

© Illustration: Danielle Rhoda/The Guardian

© Illustration: Danielle Rhoda/The Guardian

‘You call it a shitshow – I say it’s unforgivable’: Lisa Nandy on Epstein, Mandelson and Labour’s torrid week

12 February 2026 at 00:00

The culture secretary talks about secret briefings, the need for solidarity and why the government must recognise its big moment of reckoning

It is the day after the night before. On Monday, Keir Starmer looked as if he was on his last political legs. At lunchtime, the Scottish Labour party leader Anas Sarwar called for his resignation, but by the evening, the troops had rallied, and the prime minister had survived the worst. At least until the Gorton and Denton byelection later this month.

Now it’s Tuesday afternoon and there’s a hush around 100 Parliament St, home to the government’s culture, media and sport department. It’s hard to know whether this is its natural state (it’s also the headquarters of HMRC), or whether the country’s politicians and civil servants are in a collective state of shock.

Continue reading...

© Photograph: Alicia Canter/The Guardian

© Photograph: Alicia Canter/The Guardian

© Photograph: Alicia Canter/The Guardian

Britain and Japan Join Forces on Cybersecurity and Strategic Minerals

Japanese cybersecurity

Japan and Britain have agreed to expand cooperation on cybersecurity and critical mineral supply chains, framing the move as a strategic response to intensifying geopolitical, economic, and technological pressures. The British and Japanese cybersecurity strategy and agreement were confirmed during British Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s overnight visit to Tokyo, where leaders from both countries reaffirmed their commitment to collective security and economic resilience.  At a joint news conference in Tokyo, Starmer said the timing of his visit was shaped by mounting global instability. “Geopolitical, economic, and technological shocks are literally shaking the world,” he said, adding that he and Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi had agreed to strengthen collective security across the Atlantic and the Indo-Pacific. Central to those efforts is the launch of a new cyber strategic partnership intended “to improve our cybersecurity to protect our economy,” placing cybersecurity in Japan and in the UK at the core of bilateral cooperation.  Starmer’s Tokyo stop came immediately after he visited Beijing, where he met Chinese President Xi Jinping and agreed to seek a long-term, stable “strategic partnership.” Cyble Annual Threat Landscape Report, Annual Threat Landscape Report, Cyble Annual Threat Landscape Report 2025, Threat Landscape Report 2025, Cyble, Ransomware, Hacktivism, AI attacks, Vulnerabilities, APT, ICS Vulnerabilities

Britain and Japanese Cybersecurity Strategy Also Includes Minerals and Supply Chain Resilience 

Alongside British and Japanese cybersecurity strategies, leaders from both nations focused on the strategic importance of critical minerals, which are essential for advanced manufacturing, clean energy technologies, and defense systems. Prime Minister Takaichi pointed to growing concerns over global export restrictions, stressing the urgency of cooperation among trusted partners. “We agreed that the like-minded countries must work together” to strengthen supply chain resilience, she said.  Britain's and Japan's cybersecurity strategy also includes securing access to critical minerals and has become a national security issue as much as an economic one. Disruptions to supply chains could affect everything from digital infrastructure to defense readiness, making cooperation between Tokyo and London a key pillar of broader economic resilience. The bilateral discussions took place as Japan faces heightened tensions with China, particularly after comments by Takaichi regarding possible Japanese involvement if China were to take military action against Taiwan, the self-governing island claimed by Beijing. These tensions have added urgency to Japan and Britain’s efforts to diversify supply chains and reinforce strategic partnerships.

Wider Security Alignments Across Europe and the Indo-Pacific 

Tokyo talks unfolded against a backdrop of expanding international security cooperation. According to The Associated Press, Japan and the European Union announced a new security and defense partnership the previous day, marking the first such agreement between the EU and an Indo-Pacific country. Japanese Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya and EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell said the partnership aims to strengthen military ties through joint exercises and increased exchanges between defense industries.  Borrell, speaking in Tokyo, described the global environment in stark terms. “We live in a very dangerous world. We live in a world of growing rivalries, climate accidents, and threats of war,” he said, arguing that “partnerships among friends” are the only effective response. He called the EU-Japan agreement “a historical and very timely step given the situation in both of our regions.” The partnership includes cooperation on cybersecurity and space defense, reinforcing the shared view that digital and hybrid threats are central to modern security challenges.  Borrell’s visit to Japan was part of a broader East Asia tour that also included South Korea, reflecting the EU’s increasing engagement in the Indo-Pacific. The tour comes as China and Russia expand joint military activities and North Korea deepens its cooperation with Moscow, including sending troops to Russia. The Tokyo discussions followed North Korea’s test launch of what is believed to be a new type of intercontinental ballistic missile.  Iwaya and Borrell expressed “grave concern” over Russia’s growing military cooperation with North Korea, including troop deployments and arms transfers, and reiterated their commitment to supporting Ukraine while condemning Russian aggression. 

UK Turns to Australia Model as British Government Considers Social Media Ban for Children

21 January 2026 at 01:13

social media ban for children

Just weeks after Australia rolled out the world’s first nationwide social media ban for children under 16, the British government has signaled it may follow a similar path. On Monday, Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the UK is considering a social media ban for children aged 15 and under, warning that “no option is off the table” as ministers confront growing concerns about young people’s online wellbeing. The move places the British government ban social media proposal at the center of a broader national debate about the role of technology in childhood. Officials said they are studying a wide range of measures, including tougher age checks, phone curfews, restrictions on addictive platform features, and potentially raising the digital age of consent.

UK Explores Stricter Limits on Social Media Ban for Children

social media ban for children In a Substack post on Tuesday, Starmer said that for many children, social media has become “a world of endless scrolling, anxiety and comparison.” “Being a child should not be about constant judgement from strangers or the pressure to perform for likes,” he wrote. Alongside the possible ban, the government has launched a formal consultation on children’s use of technology. The review will examine whether a social media ban for children would be effective and, if introduced, how it could be enforced. Ministers will also look at improving age assurance technology and limiting design features such as “infinite scrolling” and “streaks,” which officials say encourage compulsive use. The consultation will be backed by a nationwide conversation with parents, young people, and civil society groups. The government said it would respond to the consultation in the summer.

Learning from Australia’s Unprecedented Move

British ministers are set to visit Australia to “learn first-hand from their approach,” referencing Canberra’s decision to ban social media for children under 16. The Australian law, which took effect on December 10, requires platforms such as Instagram, Facebook, X, Snapchat, TikTok, Reddit, Twitch, Kick, Threads, and YouTube to block underage users or face fines of up to AU$32 million. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese made clear why his government acted. “Social media is doing harm to our kids, and I’m calling time on it,” he said. “I’ve spoken to thousands of parents… they’re worried sick about the safety of our kids online, and I want Australian families to know that the Government has your back.” Parents and children are not penalized under the Australian rules; enforcement targets technology companies. Early figures suggest significant impact. Australia’s eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman-Grant said 4.7 million social media accounts were deactivated in the first week of the policy. To put that in context, there are about 2.5 million Australians aged eight to 15. “This is exactly what we hoped for and expected: early wins through focused deactivations,” she said, adding that “absolute perfection is not a realistic goal,” but the law aims to delay exposure, reduce harm, and set a clear social norm.

UK Consultation and School Phone Bans

The UK’s proposals go beyond a possible social media ban. The government said it will examine raising the digital age of consent, introducing phone curfews, and restricting addictive platform features. It also announced tougher guidance for schools, making it clear that pupils should not have access to mobile phones during lessons, breaks, or lunch. Ofsted inspectors will now check whether mobile phone bans are properly enforced during school inspections. Schools struggling to implement bans will receive one-to-one support from Attendance and Behaviour Hub schools. Although nearly all UK schools already have phone policies—99.9% of primary schools and 90% of secondary schools—58% of secondary pupils reported phones being used without permission in some lessons. Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said: “Mobile phones have no place in schools. No ifs, no buts.”

Building on Existing Online Safety Laws

Technology Secretary Liz Kendall said the government is prepared to take further action beyond the Online Safety Act. “These laws were never meant to be the end point, and we know parents still have serious concerns,” she said. “We are determined to ensure technology enriches children’s lives, not harms them.” The Online Safety Act has already introduced age checks for adult sites and strengthened rules around harmful content. The government said children encountering age checks online has risen from 30% to 47%, and 58% of parents believe the measures are improving safety. The proposed British government ban social media initiative would build on this framework, focusing on features that drive excessive use regardless of content. Officials said evidence from around the world will be examined as they consider whether a UK-wide social media ban for children could work in practice. As Australia’s experience begins to unfold, the UK is positioning itself to decide whether similar restrictions could reshape how children engage with digital platforms. The consultation marks the start of what ministers describe as a long-term effort to ensure young people develop a healthier relationship with technology.
❌