❌

Normal view

There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.
Yesterday β€” 17 May 2024Main stream

Colorado voters to decide on abortion rights after measure qualifies for ballot

17 May 2024 at 17:49

Supporters gather enough valid signatures to put measure – that would enshrine abortion rights into constitution – on to ballot

Voters in Colorado will have a say on abortion rights this fall after supporters collected enough valid signatures to put a measure on the ballot, part of a national push to pose abortion rights questions to voters since the US supreme court removed the nationwide right to abortion.

The Colorado measure officially made the ballot on Friday and would enshrine abortion rights into the constitution in a state which already allows abortion at all stages of pregnancy despite the supreme court’s overturning of Roe v Wade.

Continue reading...

πŸ’Ύ

Β© Photograph: Jason Connolly/AFP/Getty Images

πŸ’Ύ

Β© Photograph: Jason Connolly/AFP/Getty Images

British MPs are attacking abortion rights. We can’t follow the same path as the US | Hilary Freeman

17 May 2024 at 05:00

My own traumatic experience shows why we must push back against those who try to chip away at our freedom of choice

As the criminal justice bill stumbles through parliament this week – beset by delays and controversies, and picking up amendments as it goes – another woman, Sophie Harvey, is on trial for an alleged illegal abortion, after taking pills to end her pregnancy when she was past the 24-week legal threshold. She was just 19 at the time. She faces a sentence of up to life in prison.

Anyone who cares about women’s rights should be alarmed not just by this trial, but by two new amendments to the bill put forward, targeting abortion in England and Wales. The first, from Caroline Ansell, a Conservative MP, aims to reduce the abortion limit to 22 weeks. The other, tabled by Liam Fox, another Conservative, would stop women’s choice over whether to abort a pregnancy where Down’s syndrome looks likely, up to birth. Currently, she can choose to do so for the entirety of her pregnancy, under ground E of the Abortion Act, which allows for termination if there is β€œsubstantial risk that if the child were born it would suffer from such physical or mental abnormalities as to be seriously handicapped”.

Continue reading...

πŸ’Ύ

Β© Photograph: SOPA Images/LightRocket/Getty Images

πŸ’Ύ

Β© Photograph: SOPA Images/LightRocket/Getty Images

Before yesterdayMain stream

Supreme Court Arguments on Idaho’s Abortion Ban: 5 Takeaways

24 April 2024 at 15:19
The court’s ruling could extend to at least half a dozen other states that have similarly restrictive bans, and the implications of the case could stretch beyond abortion.

Β© Haiyun Jiang for The New York Times

Idaho’s attorney general, RaΓΊl Labrador, speaking outside the Supreme Court on Wednesday.

Abortion Data Wars: States and Cities Debate How Much Information to Collect

Some states with Republican-controlled legislatures want more data, while some controlled by Democrats want less, fearing it could be used to target patients or providers.

Β© Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters

Abortion rights supporters say they are especially concerned about the potential for anti-abortion states to use data to track patients who travel out-of-state for abortions or receive pills shipped from other states.

Women Talk Through Their Abortions on TikTok

18 April 2024 at 09:58
At a time of heightened confusion and legal battles over access to abortion, women are looking to social media for answers.

Β© Paola Chapdelaine for The New York Times

Arizona’s 1864 Abortion Ban: The History Behind the 160-Year-Old Law

10 April 2024 at 10:55
The state’s Supreme Court ruled that the 1864 law is enforceable today. Here is what led to its enactment.

Β© Rebecca Noble/Reuters

Demonstrators at a small rally led by Women’s March Tucson on Tuesday in Tucson, Ariz., after the Arizona Supreme Court revived a law dating to 1864 that bans abortion in virtually all instances.
❌
❌