❌

Normal view

There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.
Yesterday β€” 17 May 2024Main stream

Study Suggests Waiting Longer Before Withdrawing Life Support

17 May 2024 at 05:03
A review of a limited number of cases of unresponsive patients with severe traumatic brain injuries raised questions about a custom of making a decision within 72 hours.

Β© Shannon Stapleton/Reuters

A new study found that 42 percent of those who had continued life support recovered enough in the next year to have some degree of independence. A few even returned to their former lives.

Patients in England want right to see GPs with 24 hours enshrined in NHS

Exclusive: Royal College of GPs says constitution guarantee would just pile on pressure given loss of 1,000 practices in past 10 years

Seven in 10 people want to be able to see a GP urgently within 24 hours, research by the NHS’s patient watchdog has found.

Almost three-quarters (71%) of voters in England support automatic access to a family doctor within one day of requesting an appointment for a health problem they consider cannot wait.

Continue reading...

πŸ’Ύ

Β© Photograph: Julian Claxton/Alamy

πŸ’Ύ

Β© Photograph: Julian Claxton/Alamy

Before yesterdayMain stream

When doctors withhold futile treatments, that isn’t β€˜assisted dying’ | Letter

15 May 2024 at 12:17

Physician-assisted suicide is incompatible with doctors’ duty to patients as spelled out in the GMC's guidance, writes Dr James Haslam

I write in response to Dr Jagat Aulakh’s letter (A form of assisted dying already happens in hospitals, 8 May). It must be made clear that withholding or withdrawing futile treatments is not and never has been assisted dying. Stopping – or not starting – treatments that are not wanted, are not working or are not worthwhile is good medicine and the law of the land. Whereas β€œassisted dying” is the modern euphemism for physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia, both forms of medicalised killing.

The General Medical Council’s Good Medical Practice guidance states: β€œPatients must be able to trust medical professionals with their lives and health. To justify that trust [doctors] must make the care of patients [their] first concern.” Assisted suicide and euthanasia is incompatible with such a duty. How can patients trust professionals who facilitate their killing?

Continue reading...

πŸ’Ύ

Β© Photograph: Virojt Changyencham/Getty Images

πŸ’Ύ

Β© Photograph: Virojt Changyencham/Getty Images

Grandmother Becomes Second Patient to Receive Kidney From Gene-Edited Pig

24 April 2024 at 14:33
NYU Langone Health surgeons performed the transplant after implanting a mechanical heart pump in the severely ill patient.

Β© Shelby Lum/Associated Press

Lisa Pisano, the recipient of a genetically modified pig kidney, shared photos on her phone while recovering from her surgeries.

David Egilman, Doctor Who Took On Drug Companies, Dies at 71

15 April 2024 at 14:25
His testimony as an expert witness in some 600 trials helped plaintiffs win billions of dollars in cases involving malfeasance by pharmaceutical makers.

Β© Faith Ninivaggi/Reuters

Dr. David Egilman in his office in Attleboro, Mass., in 2019. He spent his career taking on drug companies, such as Eli Lilly and Johnson & Johnson, trying to increase accountability.

Texas Surgeon Is Accused of Secretly Denying Liver Transplants

A Houston hospital is investigating whether a doctor altered a transplant list to make his patients ineligible for care. A disproportionate number of them have died while waiting for new organs.

Β© Matt Patterson, via Associated Press

Memorial Hermann-Texas Medical Center in Houston.

Share Your Story About the Organ Transplant System

We want to hear from patients as well as doctors, nurses, technicians, medical residents and any others with experience in the system.

Β© Molly Riley/Associated Press

Organ transplants can extend lives, but the system has come under fire recently.

Arizona’s 1864 Abortion Ban: The History Behind the 160-Year-Old Law

10 April 2024 at 10:55
The state’s Supreme Court ruled that the 1864 law is enforceable today. Here is what led to its enactment.

Β© Rebecca Noble/Reuters

Demonstrators at a small rally led by Women’s March Tucson on Tuesday in Tucson, Ariz., after the Arizona Supreme Court revived a law dating to 1864 that bans abortion in virtually all instances.
❌
❌