For too long, security has been cast as a bottleneck – swooping in after developers build and engineers test to slow things down. The reality is blunt; if it’s bolted on, you’ve already lost. The ones that win make security part of every decision, from the first line of code to the last boardroom conversation...

The post Cultural Lag Leaves Security as the Weakest Link appeared first on Security Boulevard.

AI-generated code is reshaping software development and introducing new security risks. Organizations must strengthen governance, expand testing and train developers to ensure AI-assisted coding remains secure and compliant.

The post Securing AI-Generated Code in Enterprise Applications: The New Frontier for AppSec Teams  appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Alan reflects on a turbulent year in DevSecOps, highlighting the rise of AI-driven security, the maturing of hybrid work culture, the growing influence of platform engineering, and the incredible strength of the DevSecOps community — while calling out the talent crunch, tool sprawl and security theater the industry must still overcome.

The post What I’m Thankful for in DevSecOps This Year: Living Through Interesting Times appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Discover what’s changed in the OWASP 2025 Top 10 and how GitGuardian helps you mitigate risks like broken access control and software supply chain failures.

The post OWASP Top 10 2025 Updates: Supply Chain, Secrets, And Misconfigurations Take Center Stage appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Striving for digital transformation, organizations are innovating at an incredibly fast pace. They deploy new applications, services, and platforms daily, creating great opportunities for growth and efficiency. However, this speedy transformation comes with a significant, often overlooked, consequence: an accumulated massive vulnerability backlog. This ever-expanding list of unpatched software flaws, system misconfigurations, and coding errors is a silent drain on an organization's most valuable resources.  For many IT and security teams, the vulnerability backlog is a source of constant pressure and a seemingly unwinnable battle. As soon as they deploy one batch of patches, a new wave of critical vulnerabilities is disclosed.   This reactive cybersecurity approach is both unsustainable and incredibly costly. The true price of a vulnerability backlog extends far beyond the person-hours spent on patching. It manifests as operational friction, stifled innovation, employee burnout, and a persistent, elevated risk of a catastrophic cyberattack.   To truly secure the modern enterprise, leaders must look beyond traditional scanning and patching cycles and embrace a new, proactive paradigm for vulnerability management. 

The Anatomy of a Swelling Vulnerability Backlog

A vulnerability backlog is the aggregate of all known but unaddressed security weaknesses within an organization’s IT environment. These weaknesses can range from critical flaws in open-source libraries and commercial software to misconfigured cloud services and insecure code pushed during quick development cycles.  There are three principal reasons the backlog grows incessantly: 

1. The sheer volume of newly discovered vulnerabilities, numbering in the tens of thousands each year
2. The complexity of modern, hybrid environments, where assets are spread across on-premises data centers and multiple cloud providers
3. The monumental challenge of tracking and patching every critical vulnerability

The growing mountain of security weaknesses creates a form of vulnerability debt. It accumulates when you defer patching due to operational constraints, resource limitations, or the fear of breaking critical applications.  The longer a vulnerability remains unpatched, the more time attackers have to develop exploits and launch attacks and turn even a low-priority issue into a full-blown crisis. 

The True, Multifaceted Cost of Inaction 

The costs associated with a large vulnerability backlog are both direct and indirect, affecting your organization’s financial health, operational agility, and human capital. 

Financial and Operational Drains 

The most obvious cost is the direct expense of remediation. That includes the salaries of security professionals who spend countless hours identifying, prioritizing, and deploying patches.  However, the indirect costs are often far greater. Developer productivity plummets when teams are constantly pulled away from building new features to address security issues. It affects the time-to-market for new products and services, handing an advantage to more agile competitors.  In case of a breach from an unpatched vulnerability, the financial fallout can be devastating. It can encompass everything from regulatory fines and legal fees to customer compensation and a drop in stock value. 

The Human Toll 

Beyond the financial and operational impact is the human cost. When security teams drown in a sea of alerts, alert fatigue is unavoidable. And with it, missed critical warnings amidst the terrible alert noise, too.  The constant pressure and the feeling of being perpetually behind contribute to high levels of stress and burnout, resulting in the high turnover of skilled security talent. And here is your vicious cycle: experienced professionals leave; the remaining team is stretched even thinner; and the backlog continues to grow.  This state can also strain the relationship between security, development, and operations teams, preventing the collaboration necessary for a healthy DevSecOps culture. 

From a Reactive to a Proactive Protection 

Instead of “How can we patch faster?”, the more effective question is, “How can we neutralize security risk before we patch vulnerabilities?”.  The answer lies in moving from a predominantly reactive posture revolving around patching and response to a proactive one centered around mitigation. A robust patchless mitigation platform can effectively shield your organization’s environment from exploitation, regardless of the length of your patching cycles.  For instance, Virsec provides powerful compensating controls that prevent malicious actors from exploiting a vulnerability even if it is there and unpatched.  This approach decouples cybersecurity protection from the act of patching. It gives teams the breathing room to remediate vulnerabilities in a planned, methodical way without leaving critical systems exposed to immediate threats.  Applying these mitigation controls at scale is where the smart application of artificial intelligence becomes essential. AI-driven security tools can automate burdensome tasks in security operations centers (SOCs) and security teams.  As an illustration, Virsec’s OTTOGUARD.AI leverages agentic AI to improve security operations’ efficiency in the following way: 

1. AI agents autonomously deploy and configure security probes to determine which code and software to trust.
2. They integrate with your existing cybersecurity tool stack to analyze telemetry, assess your risk environment, and identify assets that can be protected immediately (without patching).
3. They then interface with IT service management platforms, such as ServiceNow, presenting human experts with validated remediation and patching solutions for the remaining issues. Human experts have the final word, reviewing the suggested solutions and deciding whether to act on them.

Foster a Culture of Shared Responsibility 

Technology alone is not a panacea. The most effective vulnerability management programs stand on a strong security culture that breaks down silos between development, security, and operations.  Hence, before anything else, strive to build this culture of collaboration and unified goals. It will inevitably instill a sense of shared responsibility for your organization’s security posture and motivate every individual to be a proactive guardian against threats. 

Final Thoughts 

By combining proactive protection with AI-driven automation and a culture of shared responsibility, organizations can begin to tame their vulnerability backlogs.  This multi-layered approach helps you reduce the risk of a breach, frees up valuable resources, accelerates innovation, and builds a more resilient and future-proof enterprise.  Its goal is to transform security from a cost center and a source of friction into a true business enabler. Because that's what cybersecurity really is: an essential business enabler that makes it possible for organizations to innovate with confidence in an increasingly complex digital world. 

From prompt injection to cascading agent failures, GenAI expands the enterprise attack surface. A governance-first, security-focused approach—rooted in trusted data, guardrails, and ongoing oversight—is now critical for responsible AI adoption.

The post Governing the Unseen Risks of GenAI: Why Bias Mitigation and Human Oversight Matter Most   appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Learn how to transform your traditional SOC into an AI-powered security hub with multi-agent collaboration, contextual intelligence, and business risk–driven insights.

The post Bringing AI to the SOC is not Intended to Replace Humans  appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Explore how AI is transforming cybersecurity from reactive threat response to proactive, predictive protection — while addressing ethics, privacy, and the human-AI balance.

The post The Future of AI in Security: From Reactive to Proactive Protection  appeared first on Security Boulevard.

As AI investments surge toward $1 trillion by 2027, many organizations still see zero ROI due to hidden security and cost risks. Discover how aligning FinOps with security practices helps identify AI-related vulnerabilities, control cloud costs, and build sustainable, secure AI operations.

The post Using FinOps to Detect AI-Created Security Risks  appeared first on Security Boulevard.

A survey of 400 cybersecurity leaders in the U.S. and United Kingdom published today finds all respondents reporting that AI tools are now generating code in their organization’s code base, with just under a third now seeing those tools being used to generate most of the code being created. Commissioned by Cycode, a provider of..

The post Survey: Cybersecurity Leaders Much More Concerned About AI Generated Code appeared first on Security Boulevard.

The Salesloft Drift OAuth token breach compromised Salesforce data across hundreds of enterprises, including Cloudflare, Zscaler, and Palo Alto Networks. Learn how attackers exploited OAuth tokens, the risks of connected app misuse, and key steps to strengthen Salesforce and multi-cloud security.

The post Salesloft Drift Breaches: Your Complete Response Guide  appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Cryptojacking silently hijacks compute power, inflates cloud bills, and erodes performance. Beyond financial losses, it exposes deep security risks, damages reputation, and drains productivity—making proactive detection and prevention essential for every organization.

The post The Real Cost of Cryptojacking  appeared first on Security Boulevard.

As engineering teams race to adopt the Model Context Protocol (MCP) to harness the power of agentic AI, a more cautious conversation dominates security leaders’ mindshare. While the potential for innovation is clear, the primary question for CISOs and CIOs is more fundamental: how are we going to manage the growing risk?  The answer is..

The post The CISO’s Guide to Model Context Protocol (MCP) appeared first on Security Boulevard.