Kenyans Made a Living Writing College Essays. Then A.I. Arrived.

Β© Kang-Chun Cheng for The New York Times

Β© Kang-Chun Cheng for The New York Times

Β© Tierney L. Cross/The New York Times

Β© Josie Norton

Β© Daniel Zender

Β© Manuel Orbegozo for The New York Times

Β© Manuel Orbegozo for The New York Times

Β© Kelsey McClellan for The New York Times

Β© Simon Bailly

Β© Joseph Seif for The New York Times

Β© Lucia Vazquez for The New York Times

Β© Clayton Steward for The New York Times

Β© Brendan McDermid/Reuters

Β© Vincent Alban/The New York Times

Β© Benjamin Rasmussen for The New York Times

Β© Jason Henry for The New York Times

Β© Jason Henry for The New York Times

Β© Anna Rose Layden/Reuters

Β© Lila Barth for The New York Times

Β© Anna Barclay/Getty Images

Β© Ricardo Tomás

Β© Manuel Orbegozo for The New York Times

Β© William West/Agence France-Presse β Getty Images

Β© Jason Henry for The New York Times

Β© Jason Henry for The New York Times

Β© Chona Kasinger for The New York Times

Β© Karl Mondon/Agence France-Presse β Getty Images

Β© Edmund D. Fountain for The New York Times

Β© Victor Arce

Β© Brennan Smart for The New York Times

Β© Getty Images

Β© Anna Barclay/Getty Images

Β© Frederic J. Brown/Agence France-Presse β Getty Images

Β© Katarina Premfors for The New York Times

Β© Caroline Gutman for The New York Times

Β© Bertrand Langlois/Agence France-Presse β Getty Images

Β© Ricardo Nagaoka for The New York Times

Β© Jason Henry for The New York Times

Β© Patrick Leger

Β© Lia Sued C.
A while back, when chatting with a colleague over their computer, I noticed that a logo did not look exactly the same as it did on mine. It looked thinner on theirs and more faithful to the original image. It was rendered at 15px; here is an upscaled version.
[β¦]
If you squint, or take a step back, the one from Chrome looks thicker. A bit weird, but swapping the image for an SVG fixed it. Still, I was curious: why was it rendering like this in the first place?
I did some digging and found a nifty optimization that Chrome uses when rendering JPEGs at small scales.
β« Guillaume TΓ©cher
I love it when people detail their discoveries like this.

Β© Shane Anthony Sinclair/Getty Images for Cannes Lions

Β© Sisi Yu
Cookies are ancient technology, and in no way necessary of even particularly desirable to track you. Modern fingerprinting doesnβt need them at all.
A live demonstration of everything a website learns about you before you click anything with no cookies. It reads you during the connection and in the first two seconds of JavaScript, then narrates what it found back to you in plain English, as if a stranger were describing you out loud.
The argument isnβt βlook how creepy this site is.β Itβs: the site you visit after this one can do all of it too, and wonβt tell you.
β« Kuber Mehta
Also note, as the demonstration does, that if some of the things it determines about you are wrong, that doesnβt really matter. In fact, it may actually make fingerprinting and tracking you easier; as long as fingerprinting consistently gets the same things wrong in the same way, it becomes a valuable part of the fingerprint, like a small scar obscuring part of your real thumbβs fingerprint.
Online tracking of people should be illegal.
Out of all the bloody things Microsoft could release as open source, they chose the worldβs weirdest IRC client they shipped in the late β90s that nobody used or even remembered? What on earth is happening?
Microsoft Comic Chat is a Microsoft-developed Internet Relay Chat (IRC) chat client released in 1996 that rendered conversations as automatically generated comic strips. Instead of plain text, users communicated through cartoon avatars with messages displayed in speech bubbles inside dynamically composed comic panels. The application used an expert system to determine character placement, gestures, facial expressions, balloon shape, and panel layout in real time. It shipped as part of Internet Explorer 3.0 and was later bundled with Windows 98 and MSN before being discontinued in the early 2000s.
β« Comic Chatβs GitHub page
Not only is the original source code now available on GitHub, thereβs also a modern, updated version that can make use of larger displays and higher resolutions. Thereβs a deliciously β90s website for it, too.