Enlarge / Screenshot from the documentary Who Is Bobby Kennedy? (credit: whoisbobbykennedy.com)

In a lawsuit that seems determined to ignore that Section 230 exists, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has sued Meta for allegedly shadowbanning his million-dollar documentary, Who Is Bobby Kennedy? and preventing his supporters from advocating for his presidential campaign.

According to Kennedy, Meta is colluding with the Biden administration to sway the 2024 presidential election by suppressing Kennedy's documentary and making it harder to support Kennedy's candidacy. This allegedly has caused "substantial donation losses," while also violating the free speech rights of Kennedy, his supporters, and his film's production company, AV24.

Meta had initially restricted the documentary on Facebook and Instagram but later fixed the issue after discovering that the film was mistakenly flagged by the platforms' automated spam filters.

Read 25 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Enlarge (credit: Getty Images | Chesnot )

Brussels has opened an in-depth probe into Meta over concerns it is failing to do enough to protect children from becoming addicted to social media platforms such as Instagram.

The European Commission, the EU’s executive arm, announced on Thursday it would look into whether the Silicon Valley giant’s apps were reinforcing “rabbit hole” effects, where users get drawn ever deeper into online feeds and topics.

EU investigators will also look into whether Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, is complying with legal obligations to provide appropriate age-verification tools to prevent children from accessing inappropriate content.

Read 12 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Company’s social media platforms, which also include Instagram, may have addictive effects, says European Commission

• Business live – latest updates

The European Commission has opened an investigation into the owner of Facebook and Instagram over concerns that the platforms are creating addictive behaviour among children and damaging mental health.

The EU executive said Meta may have breached the Digital Services Act (DSA), a landmark law passed by the bloc last summer that makes digital companies large and small liable for disinformation, shopping scams, child abuse and other online harms.

Cannes film festival
First-time actor Agathe Riedinger is a wannabe influencer from the wrong side of the tracks in this forthright and fluent film

Feature first-timer Agathe Riedinger is bringing the TikTok energy for this story of a wannabe Insta influencer-princess from the wrong side of the tracks – but the director is also bringing some pretty old school social realism, exerting its downward gravitational pull. The result is forthright and fluent and fiercely acted by a newcomer lead who, in the time-honoured style of movies like this, is defiant, vulnerable and front and centre of almost every shot. But it also sometimes treads water in terms of narrative, running out of ideas before the end, and its final ambiguity about an ultimate success that is there to be hallucinated rather than achieved feels anticlimactic.

Liane, played by Malou Khebizi, is a 19-year-old with a French and Italian background living in Fréjus in the south of France. She was once given up for foster care by her troubled mother but now taken back home and is now in charge of babysitting her kid sister, whom she is busily turning into a mini-me version of her own brassy, sexualised image. Liane shoplifts and sells the stolen goods – which has paid for her breast-implant surgery and she has also had her lips done. She hangs out with her friends, getting drunk, but is fastidious about how and with whom she’s having sex; she has thousands of followers on her Only-Fans-type insta (although oddly, it doesn’t occur to her to have an actual Only Fans account). Liane also has a poignantly religious sense of her own heroic martyrdom, her ill-treatment at the hands of online haters, men and her appalling mother.

Enlarge (credit: themotioncloud/Getty Images)

Ethan Zuckerman wants to release a tool that would allow Facebook users to control what appears in their newsfeeds. His privacy-friendly browser extension, Unfollow Everything 2.0, is designed to essentially give users a switch to turn the newsfeed on and off whenever they want, providing a way to eliminate or curate the feed.

Ethan Zuckerman, a professor at University of Massachusetts Amherst, is suing Meta to release a tool allowing Facebook users to "unfollow everything." (Photo by Lorrie LeJeune)

The tool is nearly ready to be released, Zuckerman told Ars, but the University of Massachusetts Amherst associate professor is afraid that Facebook owner Meta might threaten legal action if he goes ahead. And his fears appear well-founded. In 2021, Meta sent a cease-and-desist letter to the creator of the original Unfollow Everything, Louis Barclay, leading that developer to shut down his tool after thousands of Facebook users had eagerly downloaded it.

Zuckerman is suing Meta, asking a US district court in California to invalidate Meta's past arguments against developers like Barclay and rule that Meta would have no grounds to sue if he released his tool.

Read 42 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Enlarge (credit: NurPhoto via Getty)

“Join Your Local Militia or III% Patriot Group,” a post urged the more than 650 members of a Facebook group called the Free American Army. Accompanied by the logo for the Three Percenters militia network and an image of a man in tactical gear holding a long rifle, the post continues: “Now more than ever. Support the American militia page.”

Other content and messaging in the group is similar. And despite the fact that Facebook bans paramilitary organizing and deemed the Three Percenters an “armed militia group" on its 2021 Dangerous Individuals and Organizations List, the post and group remained up until WIRED contacted Meta for comment about its existence.

Free American Army is just one of around 200 similar Facebook groups and profiles, most of which are still live, that anti-government and far-right extremists are using to coordinate local militia activity around the country.

Read 35 remaining paragraphs | Comments

SecurityWeek interviews Geoff Belknap, CISO at LinkedIn, and Guy Rosen, CISO at Facebook parent company Meta.

The post CISO Conversations: LinkedIn’s Geoff Belknap and Meta’s Guy Rosen appeared first on SecurityWeek.

Meta has threatened to pull WhatsApp out of India if the courts try to force it to break its end-to-end encryption.

On 14 March, Meta announced it would abandon CrowdTangle, saying the tool will no longer be available after August 14, 2024. While most people have never heard of CrowdTangle, among journalists the tool is considered essential. Its popularity largely depends on the ability to monitor social media activity around important elections.

This makes the timing of the change a bit awkward to say the least. Not just in the US, but in many countries around the world there are major elections in 2024.

Data analysis tool CrowdTangle was created to show publishers which posts on Facebook pages were getting the most engagement. However, researchers and journalists later discovered that monitoring which stories spread most quickly, also provides the means to find the source of disinformation and watch how it spreads.

Meta bought CrowdTangle eight years ago, and the tool helped journalists and researchers learn more about the content on Meta’s platforms, including Facebook and Instagram. It was the first major tool that let the public analyze trends on the social media platforms in real time.

But it also produced negative consequences for Meta. If content performed well, Meta received accusations of promoting that content in its algorithm. In 2021, CrowdTangle underwent some changes and the team that ran it, including founder and CEO Brandon Silverman, was dismantled.

Arguably, the only thing keeping CrowdTangle alive at that point was Article 40 of the European Union’s Digital Services Act, which requires very large platforms and search engines to share publicly available data with researchers and nonprofit groups.

So, in November of 2023, Meta introduced the Meta Content Library as a replacement for CrowdTangle to “help us meet new regulatory requirements, data-sharing and transparency compliance obligations.”

In an interview, Meta’s president of global affairs Nick Clegg said that the Meta Content Library is a better tool for researchers than CrowdTangle in almost every way. For starters, it includes data about reach, which he said offers a better picture of what content on the platform is most popular.

Researchers who have used both CrowdTangle and the Content Library are torn, they say that both tools have their strengths and weaknesses. However, the audience for the Content Library is much more limited: aside from certain fact checkers, journalists won’t have direct access.

In an open letter, Mozilla has called on Meta to keep CrowdTangle functioning until January 2025. At the time of writing, 156 universities, researchers, disinformation trackers, privacy watchers, and other social media followers have signed the request.

They fear that the absence of CrowdTangle will undermine the monitoring of election disinformation in a year that approximately half the world’s population will vote.

We don’t just report on threats – we help protect your social media

Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. Protect your social media accounts by using Cyrus, powered by Malwarebytes.

A California federal judge has ordered spyware maker NSO Group to hand over the code for Pegasus and other spyware products that were used to spy on WhatsApp users.

Meta-owned WhatsApp has been fighting NSO in court since 2019, after Pegasus was allegedly used against 1,400 WhatsApp users over the period of two weeks. During this time, NSO Group gained access to the users’ sensitive data, including encrypted messages.

NSO Group justifies the use of Pegasus by saying it’s a beneficial tool for investigating and preventing terrorist attacks and maintaining the safety of the public. However, the company also says it recognizes that some customers might abuse the abilities of the software for other purposes.

Earlier in the court case, NSO Group argued it should be recognized as a foreign government agent and, therefore, be entitled to immunity under US law limiting lawsuits against foreign countries. NSO Group is closely regulated by the Israeli ministry of defense, which reviews and has to approve the sale of all licenses to foreign governments or entities. This is likely also the reason why NSO Group claimed to be excused of all its discovery obligations in the case, due to various US and Israeli restrictions.

NSO Group argued it should only be required to hand over information about Pegasus’ installation layer, but this was denied by the court. The judge ordered NSO Group to provide the plaintiffs with the knowledge needed to understand how the relevant spyware performs the functions of accessing and extracting data.

WhatsApp said that the decision is a major victory in its mission to defend its users against cyberattacks. This may be true if a better understanding of how the spyware works leads to improvements that can thwart future abuse.

However, this is no reason to assume that this will bring an end to NSO Group’s capabilities or willingness to spy on WhatsApp users. NSO Group doesn’t have to disclose the identity of its clients and it only has to produce information concerning the full functionality of the relevant spyware, specifically for a period of one year before the alleged attack to one year after the alleged attacks, which means from April 29, 2018 to May 10, 2020. Things have developed since then.

The US sanctioned NSO Group in 2021 for developing and supplying cyber weapons to foreign governments that used these tools to maliciously target government officials, journalists, business people, activists, academics, and embassy workers.

After that period we saw many zero-day vulnerabilities brought to light in browsers and other online applications very likely used by the NSO to compromise mobile devices.

We don’t just report on phone security—we provide it

Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. Keep threats off your mobile devices by downloading Malwarebytes for iOS, and Malwarebytes for Android today.