❌

Normal view

The surprising benefits of food rationing | Letters

12 October 2026 at 12:36

Among the hardships of the second world war, a restricted diet with little sugar did little harm, write Roger Wilkinson and Helen Keats; plus a letter from Jane Robbins

An interesting juxtaposition: (While British children go hungry, we waste 1.1bn meals a year. Bring on the redistribution revolution, 6 October); and (The generation raised on sugar rations – and what their health reveals 70 years later, 7 October). Shocking that the average family throws away 156 meals a year, but this knowledge allows us war babies, who still scrape our bowls clean and only throw away items where the mould is too developed to scrape off, to be very smug. And next we’re told that we will probably live longer as a result of our parsimonious cheeseparing. My cup of smugness overflows.
Roger Wilkinson (born 1944)
Leasgill, Cumbria

β€’ My 98-year-old aunt, who along with my mother and family lived in Rotterdam during the German occupation and β€œhunger winter”, is remarkably healthy. She lives independently, does her own shopping and cooking, and cycled to the local care home to β€œhelp out” until she was 80.

Continue reading...

Β© Photograph: Alamy

Β© Photograph: Alamy

Β© Photograph: Alamy

We Asked Starbucks Why Their 'Sugar-Free' Drinks Have Sugar...

6 October 2026 at 20:17
...and Now We're Just More Confused. "A federal lawsuit filed Friday alleges that Starbucks is misleading consumers with a line of "sugar-free" drinks that actually contain a significant amount of sugar. The company denies the allegations, but a quick visit to the Starbucks website reveals that some drinks labeled as sugar-free also have nutrition labels that explain the beverages have as much as 21 grams of sugar."

Related from 2024: 'Boneless' chicken wings can have bones, the Ohio Supreme Court says Previously on the blue: Burger King must defend its Whopper size in court. Other fast food chains may follow

The generation raised on sugar rations – and what their health reveals 70 years later

7 October 2026 at 01:00

From blood pressure to ageing, research suggests the first 1,000 days of sugar exposure could leave a decades-long mark on health

They were born into a Britain still recovering from the hardships of war. Though the air-raid sirens had fallen silent, many everyday foods remained rationed, including sugar. Adults were restricted to about 3 tablespoons (40g) a day to stretch between cups of tea, baking and desserts; children were limited to less than a tablespoon. Babies and very young children were expected to have little or no added sugar.

Then, in 1953, the brakes came off. Separate restrictions on sweets and chocolate were lifted in February, followed by sugar in September. By the second half of 1954, average sugar consumption had almost doubled.

Continue reading...

Β© Photograph: Ashwood/Getty Images

Β© Photograph: Ashwood/Getty Images

Β© Photograph: Ashwood/Getty Images

❌