Coupang CEO Resigns, a headline many in South Korea expected, but still signals a major moment for the country’s tech and e-commerce landscape. Coupang Corp. confirmed on Wednesday that its CEO, Park Dae-jun, has stepped down following a massive Coupang data breach that exposed the personal information of 33.7 million people, almost two-thirds of the country. Park said he was “deeply sorry” for the incident and accepted responsibility both for the breach and for the company’s response. His exit, while formally described as a resignation, is widely seen as a forced departure given the scale of the fallout and growing anger among customers and regulators. To stabilize the company, Coupang’s U.S. parent, Coupang Inc., has appointed Harold Rogers, its chief administrative officer and general counsel, as interim CEO. The parent company said the leadership change aims to strengthen crisis management and ease customer concerns.

What Happened in the Coupang Data Breach

The company clarified that the latest notice relates to the previously disclosed incident on November 29 and that no new leak has occurred. According to Coupang’s ongoing investigation, the leaked information includes:

• Customer names and email addresses
• Full shipping address book details, such as names, phone numbers, addresses, and apartment entrance access codes
• Portions of the order information

Coupang emphasized that payment details, passwords, banking information, and customs clearance codes were not compromised. As soon as it identified the leak, the company blocked abnormal access routes and tightened internal monitoring. It is now working closely with the Ministry of Science and ICT, the National Police Agency, the Personal Information Protection Commission (PIPC), the Korea Internet & Security Agency (KISA), and the Financial Supervisory Service.

Phishing, Smishing, and Impersonation Alerts

Coupang warned customers to be extra cautious as leaked data can fuel impersonation scams. The company reminded users that:

• Coupang never asks customers to install apps via phone or text.
• Unknown links in messages should not be opened.
• Suspicious communications should be reported to 112 or the Financial Supervisory Service.
• Customers must verify messages using Coupang’s official customer service numbers.

Users who stored apartment entrance codes in their delivery address book were also urged to change them immediately. The company also clarified that delivery drivers rarely call customers unless necessary to access a building or resolve a pickup issue, a small detail meant to help people recognize potential scam attempts.

Coupang CEO Resigns as South Korea Toughens Cyber Rules

The departure of CEO Park comes at a time when South Korea is rethinking how corporations respond to data breaches. The government’s 2025 Comprehensive National Cybersecurity Strategy puts direct responsibility on CEOs for major security incidents. It also expands CISOs' authority, strengthens IT asset management requirements, and gives chief privacy officers greater influence over security budgets. This shift follows other serious breaches, including SK Telecom’s leak of 23 million user records, which led to a record 134.8 billion won fine. Regulators are now considering fines of up to 1.2 trillion won for Coupang, roughly 3% of its annual sales, under the Personal Information Protection Act. The company also risks losing its ISMS-P certification, a possibility unprecedented for a business of its size.

Industry Scramble After a Coupang Data Breach of This Scale

A Coupang Data breach affecting tens of millions of people has sent shockwaves across South Korea’s corporate sector. Authorities have launched emergency inspections of 1,600 ISMS-certified companies and begun unannounced penetration tests. Security vendors say Korean companies are urgently adding multi-factor authentication, AI-based anomaly detection, insider threat monitoring, and stronger access controls. Police naming a former Chinese Coupang employee as a suspect has intensified focus on insider risk. Government agencies, including the National Intelligence Service, are also working with private partners to shorten cyber-incident analysis times from 14 days to 5 days using advanced AI forensic labs.

Looking Ahead

With the Coupang CEO's resignation development now shaping the company’s crisis trajectory, Coupang faces a long road to rebuilding trust among users and regulators. The company says its teams are working to resolve customer concerns quickly, but the broader lesson is clear: cybersecurity failures now carry real consequences, including at the highest levels of leadership.

Sometimes it’s hard to understand how some scams work or why criminals would even try them on you.

In this case it may have been a matter of timing. One of my co-workers received this one:

“Insurance estimates for certain age ranges:

20-30 ~ 200 – 300/mo
31-40 ~ 270 – 450/mo
41-64 ~ 350 – 500/mo

Please respond with your age and gender for a tailored pricing.”

A few red flags:

• No company name
• Unsolicited message from an unknown number
• They ask for personal information (age, gender)

First off, don’t respond to this kind of message, not even to tell them to get lost. A reply tells the scammer that the number is “responsive,” which only encourages more texts.

And if you provide the sender with the personal details they ask for, those can be used later for social engineering, identity theft, or building a profile for future scams.

How these insurance scams work

Insurance scams fall into two broad groups: scams targeting consumers (to steal money or data) and fraud against insurers (fake or inflated claims). Both ultimately raise premiums and can expose victims to identity theft or legal trouble. Criminals like insurance-themed lures because policies are complex, interactions are infrequent, and high-value payouts make fraud profitable.

Here, we’re looking at the consumer-focused attacks.

Different criminal groups have their own goals and attack methods, but broadly speaking they’re after one of three goals: sell your data to other criminals, scam you out of money, or steal your identity.

Any reply with your details usually leads to bigger asks, like more texts, or a link to a form that wants even more information. For example, the scammer will promise “too good to be true” premiums and all you have to do is fill out this form with your financial details and upload a copy of your ID to prove who you are. That’s everything needed for identity theft.

Scammers also time these attacks around open enrollment periods. During health insurance enrollment windows, it’s common for criminals to pose as licensed agents to sell fake policies or harvest personal and financial information.

How to stay safe from insurance scams

The first thing to remember is not to respond. But if you feel you have to look into it, do some research first. Some good questions to ask yourself before you proceed:

• Does the sender’s number belong to a trusted organization?
• Are they offering something sensible or is it really too good to be true?
• When sent to a website, does the URL in the address bar belong to the organization you expected to visit?
• Is the information they’re asking for actually required?

You can protect yourself further by:

• Keeping your browser and other important apps up to date.
• Use a real-time anti-malware solution with a web protection component.
• Consult with friends or family to check whether you’re doing the right thing.

After engaging with a suspicious sender, use STOP, our simple scam response framework to help protect against scams. 

• Slow down: Don’t let urgency or pressure push you into action. Take a breath before responding. Legitimate businesses, like your bank or credit card provider, don’t push immediate action.  
• Test them: If you’re on a call and feel pressured, ask a question only the real person would know, preferably something that can’t easily be found online. 
• Opt out: If something feels wrong, hang up or end the conversation. You can always say the connection dropped. 
• Prove it: Confirm the person is who they say they are by reaching out yourself through a trusted number, website, or method you have used before. 

Pro tip: You can upload suspicious messages of any kind to Malwarebytes Scam Guard. It will tell you whether it’s likely to be a scam and advise you what to do.

---

We don’t just report on threats—we help safeguard your entire digital identity

Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. Protect your, and your family’s, personal information by using identity protection.

In 2025, the construction industry stands at the crossroads of digital transformation and evolving cybersecurity risks, making it a prime target for threat actors. Cyber adversaries, including ransomware operators, organized cybercriminal networks, and state-sponsored APT groups from countries such as China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea, are increasingly focusing their attacks on the building and construction sector. 

These actors exploit the industry’s growing dependence on vulnerable IoT‑enabled heavy machinery, Building Information Modeling (BIM) systems, and cloud‑based project management platforms. 

Ransomware campaigns designed to disrupt project timelines, supply chain attacks exploiting third‑party software and equipment vendors, and social engineering schemes targeting on‑site personnel pose substantial operational and financial risks. Compounding this, data privacy mandates and regulatory scrutiny have intensified globally, pressing construction companies to implement robust cybersecurity measures. 

In this two-part series, Rapid7 is looking at the threats the construction industry faces, how threat actors are entering their networks, and the most common vulnerabilities construction industry security professionals should remediate now. 

⠀

Initial access and data leaks 

The construction sector faces escalating cyber threats as rapid digital transformation and heavy reliance on third-party vendors expose firms to new vulnerabilities. Cybercriminals increasingly target construction companies for initial access and data leaks, exploiting weak security practices, outdated legacy systems, and widespread use of cloud-based project management tools. Attackers commonly employ phishing email messages, compromised credentials, and supply chain attacks, taking advantage of insufficient employee training and lax vendor risk management. 

Notably, gaining initial access to a corporate network can be resource-intensive, prompting many threat actors to seek more accessible routes: purchasing access from underground forums where intermediaries and brokers sell credentials to previously breached networks across all industries, including construction. Access types traded, such as VPN, RDP, SSH, Citrix, SMTP, and FTP, are priced based on the target’s size and network complexity. 

Once inside, cybercriminals leverage interconnected systems to move laterally and exfiltrate valuable data, including blueprints, contracts, financial records, and personal information. The complex, collaborative nature of construction projects and the frequent exchange of sensitive documents amplify the risk, making the sector a prime target for corporate espionage, financial gain, and extortion through ransomware. This evolving threat landscape underscores the urgent need for robust cybersecurity measures and comprehensive vendor risk management within the industry.

⠀

Construction company network access for sale on the dark web

⠀

VPN/RDP/Cpanel access to a construction company for sale on the dark web

⠀

Social engineering and phishing campaigns

Social engineering and phishing campaigns are particularly effective in the building and construction industry as attackers exploit the industry’s workflow and human vulnerabilities. Cybercriminals frequently use phishing emails, SMS messages, and phone calls to impersonate project managers, suppliers, or executives. These communications often appear urgent, requesting immediate payment, sensitive information, or login credentials, making them difficult for busy staff to ignore.

Common attack vectors

• Vendor impersonation: Attackers pose as legitimate suppliers to request changes in payment details or deliver fake invoices, exploiting the sector’s reliance on a broad network of subcontractors and vendors.

• Executive impersonation (“CEO fraud”): Criminals spoof senior management to pressure employees into transferring funds or divulging confidential information.

• Malicious attachments and links: Phishing messages often contain fake contracts, blueprints, or project documents, which, when opened, compromise credentials or deploy malware.

• Compromised trusted platforms: Attackers exploit open redirects or compromised accounts on construction management tools to distribute phishing links that bypass basic email security checks.

Due to several unique operational challenges, the building and construction sector is particularly vulnerable to social engineering and phishing attacks. A dispersed and mobile workforce, with employees often working remotely or across multiple job sites, makes it challenging to verify unexpected requests or consult with IT and security teams in real time. 

The urgency to complete high-value transactions under tight project deadlines can encourage employees to bypass verification procedures and overlook warning signs of suspicious communications. Additionally, the sector's complex supply chains, which involve frequent interactions with unfamiliar subcontractors, provide ample opportunities for attackers to infiltrate ongoing conversations unnoticed. 

This risk is compounded by varying levels of cybersecurity awareness among employees, particularly in smaller firms where consistent training is less common. These factors make the industry an attractive target for attackers and highlight the critical need for enhanced employee awareness, rigorous verification processes, and sector-specific cybersecurity measures.

Supply chain and third‑party risks

The construction sector’s dependence on a vast network of subcontractors, vendors, and technology providers has intensified its exposure to supply chain and third‑party cyber threats. Construction projects often involve dozens, sometimes hundreds, of different partners, each bringing their systems and security practices to the table. Unlike more centralized industries, construction companies rarely have complete visibility or control over the cybersecurity standards of every third party involved. 

This lack of uniformity creates significant blind spots that attackers can exploit. For example, a breach within a third-party software update or a compromised equipment supplier can quickly propagate throughout an entire project, causing costly delays, data loss, or operational paralysis. 

With tight deadlines and complex, geographically dispersed operations, construction firms may deprioritize cybersecurity vetting in favor of speed and cost, further compounding their risk. Effective mitigation now demands ongoing risk assessments, precise contractual cybersecurity requirements for all partners, real-time monitoring, and a collaborative approach to incident response, ensuring vulnerabilities are identified and addressed before they can impact critical projects.

⠀

Emerging threats: The Internet of Things (IoT) and Building Information Modeling (BIM)

The rapid adoption of IoT‑enabled machinery and Building Information Modeling (BIM) has transformed the construction landscape, enhancing efficiency and collaboration across project teams. However, these advances have also created new and unique points of vulnerability. 

The sector’s use of connected devices such as smart cranes, on-site sensors, and drones often operate in environments where cybersecurity is not traditionally a primary concern, and where devices may be physically accessible to outsiders or not consistently updated. Many IoT devices lack built-in security features, making them easy entry points for cyberattacks that could disrupt operations or threaten worker safety. 

Similarly, BIM platforms that centralize and share sensitive design and project data are now high-value targets, as a single compromise can reveal blueprints, project timelines, and operational details to attackers. Construction firms are particularly at risk because project sites frequently change, IT resources may be stretched thin, and digital assets are constantly being moved and accessed by different parties. 

Protecting these new technologies requires a shift in mindset: from viewing cybersecurity as a back-office concern to treating it as an essential component of on-site and digital operations, including secure device management, strong access controls, regular updates, and robust encryption practices.

Key threats and vulnerable points in IoT and BIM for construction:

• IoT device vulnerabilities:

• Weak authentication: Many IoT devices use default or weak passwords, making unauthorized access easier.

• Unpatched firmware: Devices often lack regular updates, leaving known vulnerabilities open to exploitation.

• Physical access risks: Construction sites are less secure environments, allowing attackers to tamper with or steal devices.

• Insecure communication protocols: Data sent between IoT devices and central systems may be unencrypted or poorly secured, exposing sensitive information.

• BIM threats:
  Centralized data breaches: BIM platforms hold all project data in one place so that a single breach can expose blueprints, schedules, and operational details.

• Unauthorized access: Weak access controls or shared credentials can let unauthorized users download, alter, or leak sensitive project files.

• Third-party collaboration risks: Multiple subcontractors or vendors may have access to BIM, increasing the risk of compromised accounts or insider threats.

⠀

Taking proactive steps to enhance cybersecurity

As the building and construction industry digitalizes, strengthening cybersecurity has become a business-critical priority. The following strategies address the sector’s unique challenges and offer a roadmap for reducing cyber risk.

Elevate cybersecurity to a core business priority

Historically, cybersecurity has been an afterthought in many construction firms. To change this, leadership must treat cybersecurity as essential to project delivery and business continuity. This requires investing in dedicated IT security staff, integrating cybersecurity into board-level discussions, and establishing clear policies for digital risk management throughout the organization.

Secure the digital supply chain

Given the sector’s reliance on a complex network of subcontractors and vendors, assessing and strengthening supply chain security is crucial. Firms should require vendors to meet baseline cybersecurity standards, conduct regular audits of third-party security practices, and ensure that project documents and data are shared through secure and encrypted channels. Construction companies can reduce the risk of supply chain-based attacks by holding all partners to strong security protocols.

Upgrade and harden legacy systems

Outdated software and systems remain prime targets for cybercriminals. Construction companies must thoroughly assess their IT environments, identify and replace unsupported or vulnerable technologies, and maintain a regular schedule of software updates and patching. Modern firewalls and endpoint protection further help to close critical security gaps.

Protect IoT devices and smart technology

Securing these devices is essential with the rapid adoption of IoT sensors, connected machinery, and advanced project management platforms. This means changing default passwords, disabling unnecessary services, and keeping IoT devices on networks separate from core business systems. Ongoing monitoring for unauthorized access or unusual activity helps to detect and respond to threats targeting these new endpoints.

Foster a security-aware culture

Human error is still a leading cause of cyber incidents, so regular cybersecurity training should be mandatory for all employees and contractors. Staff should be equipped to recognize phishing attempts, follow secure password practices, and report security incidents. Construction firms can strengthen their defense by building a culture where everyone understands their role in protecting digital assets.

Safeguard sensitive data and intellectual property

Protecting sensitive information such as blueprints, bids, client data, and proprietary designs is crucial. Data should be encrypted at rest and in transit, with strict access controls and permissions. Regular data backups and recovery testing are also important, along with using secure platforms for managing and sharing documents. These measures help prevent unauthorized access, data loss, and reputational harm.

As the industry reckons with its expanding digital footprint, understanding and mitigating the unique tactics and motivations of these threat actors in 2025 is prudent and imperative for ensuring project continuity, workforce safety, and reputational resilience. 

In the concluding installment of this two-part series, Rapid7 will look at how ransomware actors exploit many of the same weaknesses mentioned here. Stay tuned.

A new meeting on your calendar or a new attack vector?

It starts innocently enough. A new meeting appears in your Google calendar and the subject seems ordinary, perhaps even urgent: “Security Update Briefing,” “Your Account Verification Meeting,” or “Important Notice Regarding Benefits.” You assume you missed this invitation in your overloaded email inbox, and click “Yes” to accept.

Unfortunately, calendar invites have become an overlooked delivery mechanism for social engineering and phishing campaigns. Attackers are increasingly abusing the .ics file format, a universally trusted, text-based standard to embed malicious links, redirect victims to fake meeting pages, or seed events directly into users’ calendars without interaction. 

Because calendar files often bypass traditional email and attachment defenses, they offer a low-friction attack path into corporate environments. 

Defenders should treat .ics files as active content, tighten client defaults, and raise awareness that even legitimate-looking calendar invites can carry hidden risk.

The underestimated threat of .ics files

The iCalendar (.ics) format is one of those technologies we all rely on without thinking. It’s text-based, universally supported, and designed for interoperability between Outlook, Google Calendar, Apple, and countless other clients.

Each invite contains a structured list of fields like SUMMARY, LOCATION, DESCRIPTION, and ATTACH. Within these, attackers have found an opportunity: they can embed URLs, malicious redirects, or even base64-encoded content. The result is a file that appears completely legitimate to a calendar client, yet quietly delivers the attacker’s message, link, or payload.

Because calendar files are plain text, they easily slip through traditional security controls. Most email gateways and endpoint filters don’t treat .ics files with the same scrutiny as executables or macros. And since users expect to receive meeting invites, often from outside their organization, it’s an ideal format for social engineering.

How threat actors abuse the invite

Over the past year, researchers have observed a rise in campaigns abusing calendar invites to phish credentials, deliver malware, or trick users into joining fake meetings. These attacks often look mundane but rely on subtle manipulation:

• The lure: A professional-looking meeting name and sender, sometimes spoofed from a legitimate organization.

• The link: A URL hidden in the DESCRIPTION or LOCATION field, often pointing to a fake login page or document-sharing site.

• The timing: Invites scheduled within minutes, creating urgency (“Your access expires in 15 minutes — join now”).

• The automation: Calendar clients that automatically add external invites, ensuring the trap appears directly in the user’s daily schedule.

⠀

Example of where some of the malicious components would reside in the .ics file

⠀

It’s clever, low-effort social engineering leveraging trust in a system built for collaboration.

The “invisible click” problem

The real danger of malicious calendar invites isn’t just the link inside,  it’s the automatic delivery mechanism. In certain configurations, Outlook and Google Calendar will automatically process .ics attachments and create tentative events, even if the user never opens or even receives the email. That means the malicious link is now part of the user’s trusted interface with their calendar.

This bypasses the usual cognitive warning signs. The email might look suspicious, but the event reminder popping up later? That feels like part of your day. It’s phishing that moves in quietly and waits.

Why traditional defenses miss it

Security tooling has historically focused on attachments that execute code or scripts. By contrast, .ics files are plain text and standards-based, so they don’t inherently appear dangerous. Many detection engines ignore or minimally parse them.

Attackers exploit that gap. They rely on the fact that few organizations monitor for BEGIN:VCALENDAR content or inspect calendar metadata for embedded URLs. Once delivered, the file can bypass filters, land in the user’s calendar, and lead to a high-confidence click.

What defenders can do now

Defending against calendar-based attacks begins with recognizing that these are not edge cases anymore. They’re a natural evolution of phishing  where user convenience becomes the delivery mechanism.

Here are a few pragmatic steps every organization should consider:

1. Treat .ics files like active content. Configure email filters and attachment scanners to inspect calendar files for URLs, base64-encoded data, or ATTACH fields.

2. Review calendar client defaults. Disable automatic addition of external events when possible, or flag external organizers with clear warnings.

3. Sanitize incoming invites. Content disarm and reconstruction (CDR) tools can strip out or neutralize dangerous links embedded in calendar fields.

4. Raise awareness among users. Train employees to verify unexpected invites — especially those urging immediate action or containing meeting links they didn’t anticipate. Employees can also follow the helpful advice in this Google Support article.

5. Use strong identity protection. Multi-factor authentication and conditional access policies mitigate the impact if a phishing link successfully steals credentials.

These steps don’t eliminate the threat, but they significantly increase friction for attackers and their malware.

A quiet evolution in social engineering campaigns

Malicious calendar invites represent a subtle yet telling shift in attacker behavior: blending into legitimate business processes rather than breaking them. In the same way that invoice-themed phishing emails once exploited trust in accounting workflows, .ics abuse leverages the quiet reliability of collaboration tools.

As organizations continue to integrate calendars with chat, cloud storage, and video platforms, the attack surface will only expand. Links inside invites will lead to files in shared drives, authentication requests, and embedded meeting credentials. These are all opportunities for exploitation.

Rethinking trust in everyday workflows

Defenders often focus on the extraordinary like zero days, ransomware binaries, and new exploits. Yet the most effective attacks remain the simplest: exploiting human trust in ordinary digital habits. A calendar invite feels harmless and that’s exactly why it works.

The next time an unexpected meeting appears in your calendar, it might be more than just a double-booking. It could be a reminder that security isn’t only about blocking malware, but about questioning what we assume to be safe.

OpenAI has confirmed a security incident involving Mixpanel, a third-party analytics provider used for its API product frontend. The company clarified that the OpenAI Mixpanel security incident stemmed solely from a breach within Mixpanel’s systems and did not involve OpenAI’s infrastructure. According to the initial investigation, an attacker gained unauthorized access to a portion of Mixpanel’s environment and exported a dataset that included limited identifiable information of some OpenAI API users. OpenAI stated that users of ChatGPT and other consumer-facing products were not impacted.

OpenAI Mixpanel Security Incident: What Happened

The OpenAI Mixpanel security incident originated on November 9, 2025, when Mixpanel detected an intrusion into a section of its systems. The attacker successfully exported a dataset containing identifiable customer information and analytics data. Mixpanel notified OpenAI on the same day and shared the affected dataset for review on November 25. OpenAI emphasized that despite the breach, no OpenAI systems were compromised, and sensitive information such as chat content, API requests, prompts, outputs, API keys, passwords, payment details, government IDs, or authentication tokens were not exposed. The exposed dataset was strictly limited to analytics data collected through Mixpanel’s tracking setup on platform.openai.com, the frontend interface for OpenAI’s API product.

Information Potentially Exposed in the Mixpanel Data Breach

OpenAI confirmed that the type of information potentially included in the dataset comprised:

• Names provided on API accounts
• Email addresses associated with API accounts
• Coarse location data (city, state, country) based on browser metadata
• Operating system and browser information
• Referring websites
• Organization or User IDs linked to API accounts

OpenAI noted that the affected information does not include chat content, prompts, responses, or API usage data. Additionally, ChatGPT accounts, passwords, API keys, financial details, and government IDs were not involved in the incident.

OpenAI’s Response and Security Measures

In response to the Mixpanel security incident, OpenAI immediately removed Mixpanel from all production services and began reviewing the affected datasets. The company is actively notifying impacted organizations, admins, and users through direct communication. OpenAI stated that it has not found any indication of impact beyond Mixpanel’s systems but continues to closely monitor for signs of misuse. To reinforce user trust and strengthen data protection, OpenAI has:

• Terminated its use of Mixpanel
• Begun conducting enhanced security reviews across all third-party vendors
• Increased security requirements for partners and service providers
• Initiated a broader review of its vendor ecosystem

OpenAI reiterated that trust, security, and privacy remain central to its mission and that transparency is a priority when addressing incidents involving user data.

Phishing and Social Engineering Risks for Impacted Users

While the exposed information does not include highly sensitive data, OpenAI warned that the affected details, such as names, email addresses, and user IDs, could be leveraged in phishing or social engineering attacks. The company urged users to remain cautious and watch for suspicious messages, especially those containing links or attachments. Users are encouraged to:

• Verify messages claiming to be from OpenAI
• Be wary of unsolicited communication
• Enable multi-factor authentication (MFA) on their accounts
• Avoid sharing passwords, API keys, or verification codes

OpenAI stressed that the company never requests sensitive credentials through email, text, or chat. OpenAI confirmed it will provide further updates if new information emerges from ongoing investigations. Impacted users can reach out at mixpanelincident@openai.com for support or clarification.

AI-enabled cybercriminals are exploiting the holiday shopping season with precision phishing, account takeovers, payment skimming and ransomware, forcing retailers to adopt real-time, adaptive defenses to keep pace.

The post AI Cybercriminals Target Black Friday and Cyber Monday appeared first on Security Boulevard.

AI-powered cyberattacks are rising fast, and AI firewalls offer predictive, adaptive defense—but their cost, complexity and ROI must be carefully justified as organizations weigh upgrades.

The post Are AI Firewalls Worth the Investment?  appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Google is suing more than two dozen unnamed individuals allegedly involved in peddling a popular China-based mobile phishing service that helps scammers impersonate hundreds of trusted brands, blast out text message lures, and convert phished payment card data into mobile wallets from Apple and Google.

In a lawsuit filed in the Southern District of New York on November 12, Google sued to unmask and disrupt 25 “John Doe” defendants allegedly linked to the sale of Lighthouse, a sophisticated phishing kit that makes it simple for even novices to steal payment card data from mobile users. Google said Lighthouse has harmed more than a million victims across 120 countries.

Lighthouse is one of several prolific phishing-as-a-service operations known as the “Smishing Triad,” and collectively they are responsible for sending millions of text messages that spoof the U.S. Postal Service to supposedly collect some outstanding delivery fee, or that pretend to be a local toll road operator warning of a delinquent toll fee. More recently, Lighthouse has been used to spoof e-commerce websites, financial institutions and brokerage firms.

Regardless of the text message lure or brand used, the basic scam remains the same: After the visitor enters their payment information, the phishing site will automatically attempt to enroll the card as a mobile wallet from Apple or Google. The phishing site then tells the visitor that their bank is going to verify the transaction by sending a one-time code that needs to be entered into the payment page before the transaction can be completed.

If the recipient provides that one-time code, the scammers can link the victim’s card data to a mobile wallet on a device that they control. Researchers say the fraudsters usually load several stolen wallets onto each mobile device, and wait 7-10 days after that enrollment before selling the phones or using them for fraud.

Google called the scale of the Lighthouse phishing attacks “staggering.” A May 2025 report from Silent Push found the domains used by the Smishing Triad are rotated frequently, with approximately 25,000 phishing domains active during any 8-day period.

Google’s lawsuit alleges the purveyors of Lighthouse violated the company’s trademarks by including Google’s logos on countless phishing websites. The complaint says Lighthouse offers over 600 templates for phishing websites of more than 400 entities, and that Google’s logos were featured on at least a quarter of those templates.

Google is also pursuing Lighthouse under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, saying the Lighthouse phishing enterprise encompasses several connected threat actor groups that work together to design and implement complex criminal schemes targeting the general public.

According to Google, those threat actor teams include a “developer group” that supplies the phishing software and templates; a “data broker group” that provides a list of targets; a “spammer group” that provides the tools to send fraudulent text messages in volume; a “theft group,” in charge of monetizing the phished information; and an “administrative group,” which runs their Telegram support channels and discussion groups designed to facilitate collaboration and recruit new members.

“While different members of the Enterprise may play different roles in the Schemes, they all collaborate to execute phishing attacks that rely on the Lighthouse software,” Google’s complaint alleges. “None of the Enterprise’s Schemes can generate revenue without collaboration and cooperation among the members of the Enterprise. All of the threat actor groups are connected to one another through historical and current business ties, including through their use of Lighthouse and the online community supporting its use, which exists on both YouTube and Telegram channels.”

Silent Push’s May report observed that the Smishing Triad boasts it has “300+ front desk staff worldwide” involved in Lighthouse, staff that is mainly used to support various aspects of the group’s fraud and cash-out schemes.

Google alleges that in addition to blasting out text messages spoofing known brands, Lighthouse makes it easy for customers to mass-create fake e-commerce websites that are advertised using Google Ads accounts (and paid for with stolen credit cards). These phony merchants collect payment card information at checkout, and then prompt the customer to expect and share a one-time code sent from their financial institution.

Once again, that one-time code is being sent by the bank because the fake e-commerce site has just attempted to enroll the victim’s payment card data in a mobile wallet. By the time a victim understands they will likely never receive the item they just purchased from the fake e-commerce shop, the scammers have already run through hundreds of dollars in fraudulent charges, often at high-end electronics stores or jewelers.

Ford Merrill works in security research at SecAlliance, a CSIS Security Group company, and he’s been tracking Chinese SMS phishing groups for several years. Merrill said many Lighthouse customers are now using the phishing kit to erect fake e-commerce websites that are advertised on Google and Meta platforms.

“You find this shop by searching for a particular product online or whatever, and you think you’re getting a good deal,” Merrill said. “But of course you never receive the product, and they will phish that one-time code at checkout.”

Merrill said some of the phishing templates include payment buttons for services like PayPal, and that victims who choose to pay through PayPal can also see their PayPal accounts hijacked.

“The main advantage of the fake e-commerce site is that it doesn’t require them to send out message lures,” Merrill said, noting that the fake vendor sites have more staying power than traditional phishing sites because it takes far longer for them to be flagged for fraud.

Merrill said Google’s legal action may temporarily disrupt the Lighthouse operators, and could make it easier for U.S. federal authorities to bring criminal charges against the group. But he said the Chinese mobile phishing market is so lucrative right now that it’s difficult to imagine a popular phishing service voluntarily turning out the lights.

Merrill said Google’s lawsuit also can help lay the groundwork for future disruptive actions against Lighthouse and other phishing-as-a-service entities that are operating almost entirely on Chinese networks. According to Silent Push, a majority of the phishing sites created with these kits are sitting at two Chinese hosting companies: Tencent (AS132203) and Alibaba (AS45102).

“Once Google has a default judgment against the Lighthouse guys in court, theoretically they could use that to go to Alibaba and Tencent and say, ‘These guys have been found guilty, here are their domains and IP addresses, we want you to shut these down or we’ll include you in the case.'”

If Google can bring that kind of legal pressure consistently over time, Merrill said, they might succeed in increasing costs for the phishers and more frequently disrupting their operations.

“If you take all of these Chinese phishing kit developers, I have to believe it’s tens of thousands of Chinese-speaking people involved,” he said. “The Lighthouse guys will probably burn down their Telegram channels and disappear for a while. They might call it something else or redevelop their service entirely. But I don’t believe for a minute they’re going to close up shop and leave forever.”

Google has filed a complaint in court that details the scam:

In a complaint filed Wednesday, the tech giant accused “a cybercriminal group in China” of selling “phishing for dummies” kits. The kits help unsavvy fraudsters easily “execute a large-scale phishing campaign,” tricking hordes of unsuspecting people into “disclosing sensitive information like passwords, credit card numbers, or banking information, often by impersonating well-known brands, government agencies, or even people the victim knows.”

These branded “Lighthouse” kits offer two versions of software, depending on whether bad actors want to launch SMS and e-commerce scams. “Members may subscribe to weekly, monthly, seasonal, annual, or permanent licenses,” Google alleged. Kits include “hundreds of templates for fake websites, domain set-up tools for those fake websites, and other features designed to dupe victims into believing they are entering sensitive information on a legitimate website.”...

The post Scam USPS and E-Z Pass Texts and Websites appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Google has filed a complaint in court that details the scam:

In a complaint filed Wednesday, the tech giant accused “a cybercriminal group in China” of selling “phishing for dummies” kits. The kits help unsavvy fraudsters easily “execute a large-scale phishing campaign,” tricking hordes of unsuspecting people into “disclosing sensitive information like passwords, credit card numbers, or banking information, often by impersonating well-known brands, government agencies, or even people the victim knows.”

These branded “Lighthouse” kits offer two versions of software, depending on whether bad actors want to launch SMS and e-commerce scams. “Members may subscribe to weekly, monthly, seasonal, annual, or permanent licenses,” Google alleged. Kits include “hundreds of templates for fake websites, domain set-up tools for those fake websites, and other features designed to dupe victims into believing they are entering sensitive information on a legitimate website.”

Google’s filing said the scams often begin with a text claiming that a toll fee is overdue or a small fee must be paid to redeliver a package. Other times they appear as ads—­sometimes even Google ads, until Google detected and suspended accounts—­luring victims by mimicking popular brands. Anyone who clicks will be redirected to a website to input sensitive information; the sites often claim to accept payments from trusted wallets like Google Pay.

Attackers have a new trick to steal your username and password: fake browser pop-ups that look exactly like real sign-in windows. These “Browser-in-the-Browser” attacks can fool almost anyone, but a password manager and a few simple habits can keep you safe.

---

Phishing attacks continue to evolve, and one of the more deceptive tricks in the attacker’s arsenal today is the Browser-in-the-Browser (BitB) attack. At its core, BitB is a social engineering technique that makes users believe they’re interacting with a genuine browser pop-up login window when, in reality, they’re dealing with a convincing fake built right into a web page.

Researchers recently found a Phishing-as-a-Service (PhaaS) kit known as “Sneaky 2FA” that’s making these capabilities available on the criminal marketplace. Customers reportedly receive a licensed, obfuscated version of the source code and can deploy it however they like.

Attackers use this kit to create a fake browser window using HTML and CSS. It’s very deceptive because it includes a perfectly rendered address bar showing the legitimate website’s URL. From a user’s perspective, everything looks normal: the window design, the website address, even the login form. But it’s a carefully crafted illusion designed to steal your username and password the moment you start typing.

Normally we tell people to check whether the URL in the address bar matches your expectations, but in this case that won’t help. The fake URL bar can fool the human eye, it can’t fool a well-designed password manager. Password managers are built to recognize only the legitimate browser login forms, not HTML fakes masquerading as browser windows. This is why using a password manager consistently matters. It not only encourages strong, unique passwords but also helps spot inconsistencies by refusing to autofill on suspicious forms.

Sneaky 2FA uses various tricks to avoid detection and analysis. For example, by preventing security tools from accessing the phishing pages: the phishers redirect unwanted visitors to harmless sites and show the BitB page only to high-value targets. For those targets the pop-up window adapts to match each visitor’s operating system and browser.

The domains the campaigns use are also short-lived. Attackers “burn and replace” them to stay ahead of blocklists. Which makes it hard to block these campaigns based on domain names.

So, what can we do?

In the arms race against phishing schemes, pairing a password manager with multi-factor authentication (MFA) offers the best protection.

As always, you’re the first line of defense. Don’t click on links in unsolicited messages of any type before verifying and confirming they were sent by someone you trust. Staying informed is important as well, because you know what to expect and what to look for.

And remember: it’s not just about trusting what you see on the screen. Layered security stops attackers before they can get anywhere.

Another effective security layer to defend against BitB attacks is Malwarebytes’ free browser extension, Browser Guard, which detects and blocks these attacks heuristically.

---

We don’t just report on threats—we help safeguard your entire digital identity

Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. Protect your, and your family’s, personal information by using identity protection.

This article was originally published in eSchool News on 11/10/25 by Charlie Sander. Phishing via QR codes, a tactic now known as “quishing,” involves attackers embedding malicious QR codes in emails or posters Schools can keep QR logins safe and seamless by blending clear visual cues, ongoing user education, and risk-based checks behind the scenes ...

The post eSchool News: How K-12 IT Teams Lock Down QR-Based SSO Without Hurting Usability appeared first on ManagedMethods Cybersecurity, Safety & Compliance for K-12.

The post eSchool News: How K-12 IT Teams Lock Down QR-Based SSO Without Hurting Usability appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Choosing Cloud Monitor Provides Stronger Safety Alerts, Cybersecurity Protection, and Peace of Mind—All Within Budget At Richland County Community Unit School District #1 in Illinois, Technology Coordinator Ryan Roark has spent 17 years ensuring that students have access to safe, effective learning technology. His small but experienced IT team of three manages over 2,100 students ...

The post Richland County CUSD Finds “More Bang for the Buck” with ManagedMethods appeared first on ManagedMethods Cybersecurity, Safety & Compliance for K-12.

The post Richland County CUSD Finds “More Bang for the Buck” with ManagedMethods appeared first on Security Boulevard.

With AI phishing attacks rising 1,760% and achieving a 60% success rate, learn how attackers use AI, deepfakes and automation — and discover proven, multi-layered defense strategies to protect your organization in 2025.

The post How AI-Generated Content is Fueling Next-Gen Phishing and BEC Attacks: Detection and Defense Strategies  appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Cybercriminals are spoofing “email delivery” notifications to look like they came from spam filters inside your own organization. The goal is to lure you to a phishing site that steals login credentials—credentials that could unlock your email, cloud storage or other personal accounts.

The email claims that, due to an upgrade in the Secure Message system, some pending messages didn’t make it to your inbox and are ready to be moved there now.

“Email Delivery Reports: Incoming Pending Messages

We have recently upgraded our Secure Message system, and there are pending messages that have not been delivered to your Inbox.

Failure Delivery Messages

Email Delivery Reports For  info@seychellesapartment.com

   Status :                         Subject:                      Date:            Time:

{A couple of message titles that are very generic and common as not to raise any suspicion}

Move To Inbox (button)

Note     : The messages will be delivered within 1-2 hours after you receive a confirmation Mail Notice. If this message lands in your spam folder, please move it to your inbox folder

Mail Encrypted by {spoofed domain} © All Rights Reserved. | If you do not wish to receive this message    Unsubscribe. (link)”

Both the “Move to Inbox” button and the unsubscribe link abuse a cbssports[.]com redirect to reach the real phishing site located on the domain mdbgo[.]io, which was blocked by Malwarebytes.

Researchers at Unit42 warned about this type of phishing campaign, so we decided to take a closer look.

The links pass the spoofed email address as a base64-encoded string to the phishing site. Going to that site, we were served this fake login screen with the target’s domain already filled in—making it look personalized and legitimate:

Contrary to Unit42’s findings, we found that this version of the attack is more sophisticated and likely evolving quickly. The phishing site’s code is heavily obfuscated, and credentials are harvested through a websocket.

A websocket keeps an open channel between your browser and the website’s server—like a phone call that never hangs up. This lets the browser and server send messages instantly back and forth, in both directions, without needing to reload the page. Cybercriminals love using websockets because they receive your details the instant you type them into a phishing site, and can even send prompts for additional information, such as two-factor authentication (2FA) codes.

This means that if you enter your email and password on such a site, attackers could instantly take control of your email, access cloud-stored files, reset other passwords, and impersonate you across services.

How to stay safe from phishing emails

In phishing attempts like these, two simple rules can save you from lots of trouble.

• Don’t open unsolicited attachments
• Always check the website address in the browser before signing in. Make sure it matches the site you expect to be on.

Other important tips to stay safe from phishing in general:

• Verify the sender. Always check if the sender’s email address matches what you would expect it to be. It’s not always conclusive, but it can help you spot some attempts.
• Double-check requests through another channel if you receive an attachment or a link you weren’t expecting.
• Use up-to-date security software, preferably with a web protection component.
• Keep your device and all its software updated.
• Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) for every account you can.
• Use a password manager. Password managers will not auto-fill a password to a fake site, even if it looks like the real deal to you.

If you already entered credentials on a page you don’t trust, change your passwords immediately.

Pro tip: The free Malwarebytes Browser Guard extension would have stopped this attack as well:

Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)

• several subdomains of mdbgo[.]io
• xxx-three-theta.vercel[.]app
• client1.inftrimool[.]xyz
• psee[.]io
• veluntra-technology-productivity-boost-cold-pine-8f29.ellenplum9.workers[.]dev
• lotusbridge.ru[.]com
• shain-log4rtf.surge[.]sh

---

We don’t just report on threats—we remove them

Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. Keep threats off your devices by downloading Malwarebytes today.

This attempt to phish credentials caught our attention, mostly because of its front-end simplicity. Even though this is a script-kiddie-level type of attack, we figured it was worth writing up—precisely because it’s so easy to follow what they’re up to.

The email is direct and to the point. Not a lot of social engineering happening here.

“Dear ,

Pls kindly find the attached PO please send us PI once its available.”

The sender’s address belongs to a Czechoslovakian printing service (likely compromised), and the name and phone number are fake. The target is in Taiwan.

The attached .shtml file is a tidy fake login screen that doesn’t really specify which credentials they want:

The pre-filled email address in the screenshot is a fake one I added; normally it would be the target’s email.

We assume the phisher welcomes any credentials entered here, and are counting on the fact that most people reuse passwords on other sites.

Under the hood, the functionality of this attachment lies in this piece of JavaScript.

It starts with simple checks to make sure all the fields are filled out and long enough before declaring the Telegram bot that will receive the login details.

Using Telegram bots provides the phishers with several advantages:

• Stolen credentials are delivered instantly to the attacker via Telegram notifications. No need for the phisher to keep checking a database or inbox.
• Telegram is a legitimate, globally distributed messaging service, making it difficult to block.
• There’s no exposed web server or obvious phishing “drop site” that can be blocklisted or shut down.

The last line contains a credibility trick:

setTimeout(() => {window.location.assign("file:///C:/Users/USER/Downloads/Invoice_FAC_0031.pdf")}, 2000);

This tries to open a file on the user’s computer after waiting 2 seconds (2,000 milliseconds). Since this file almost certainly doesn’t exist, the browser will either block the action (especially from an email or non-local file) or show an error. Either way, it will make the login attempt look more legitimate and take the user’s mind off the fact that they just sent their credentials who knows where.

That’s really all there is to it, except for a bit of code that the dungeon-dweller forgot to remove during their copy-and-paste coding. Or they had no idea what it was for and left it in place for fear of breaking something.

I suspect the attacker originally used this code to encrypt the credentials with a hardcoded AES (Advanced Encryption Standard) key and injection vector, then send them to their server.

This attacker replaced that method with the simpler Telegram bot approach (much easier to use), but left the decryption stub because they were afraid removing it would break something.

Don’t fall for phishing attempts

Even though the sophistication level of this email was low, that does not reduce the possible impact of sending the attacker your credentials.

In phishing attempts like these, two simple rules can save you from lots of trouble.

• Don’t open unsolicited attachments
• Check if the website address in the browser matches the domain you expect to be on (e.g. adobe.com).

Other important tips to stay safe from phishing in general:

• Verify the sender: Always check if the sender’s email address matches what you would expect it to be. It’s not always conclusive but it can help you spot some attempts.
• Check through an independent channel if the sender actually sent you an attachment or a link.
• Use up-to-date security software, preferably with a web protection component.
• Keep your device and all its software updated.
• Use multi-factor authentication for every account you can.
• Use a password manager. Password managers will not auto-fill a password to a fake site, even if it looks like the real deal to you.

If you already entered credentials on a page you don’t trust, change your passwords immediately.

Pro tip: You can also upload screenshots of suspicious emails to Malwarebytes Scam Guard. It would have recognized this one as a phishing attempt.

---

We don’t just report on scams—we help detect them

Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. If something looks dodgy to you, check if it’s a scam using Malwarebytes Scam Guard, a feature of our mobile protection products. Submit a screenshot, paste suspicious content, or share a text or phone number, and we’ll tell you if it’s a scam or legit. Download Malwarebytes Mobile Security for iOS or Android and try it today!

One of the reassuring things about owning an iPhone was knowing you could lock it if it got lost or stolen. Without your passcode, fingerprint or face to unlock it, it would be useless to anyone else.

Now, though, some phone thieves have found a workaround, not by breaking Apple’s security, but by tricking owners into giving them the keys.

The Swiss National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) has issued a warning about phishing scams targeting iPhone owners who’ve lost their devices.

Phishing for Apple ID credentials

When you report an iPhone as lost in Apple’s Find My app, you can set a custom lock-screen message that appears on the missing device. Many people include an email address or phone number in that message so a helpful stranger can contact them if the phone turns up.

Unfortunately, that’s the very information scammers use to reach you. A thief (or anyone who now has the phone) can see that contact detail on the screen and send you a convincing message—usually by text, iMessage, or email—claiming to have found your device.

The scam messages often include details copied from the phone itself, such as its model and color, to make it sound authentic. It also includes a link to a fake website that mimics the Find My service that Apple operates to locate lost devices. The site will ask for the victim’s Apple ID credentials.

If the victim takes the bait, the thief can use those credentials to gain full access to the phone. That enables them to wipe it, returning it to factory settings for resale.

Although the NCSC didn’t say so, an enterprising thief could get up to all kinds of other shenanigans. They might reset the user’s Apple ID to lock them out—even on a replacement device, access their photos (yes, including any risqué ones), read their emails and nose through their apps. In short, it would give them carte blanche to your digital life.

These attacks don’t have to happen immediately. The perpetrators might text months after the device has been lost, when victims might have moved on and lowered their guard.

The good news… and the bad

The warning is both good and bad news. It’s good news because it shows that criminals are apparently unable to bypass Apple’s Activation Lock protection through technical means. The Activation Lock, turned on when you activate Find My, registers a device ID on Apple’s activation servers. Even if the criminals reset your device, the activation lock will still be there. Only someone with the user’s Apple ID credentials can unlock it. It’s a version of something called Factory Reset Protection (FRP) that the US mandated under the US Smart Phone Theft Prevention Act of 2015. Android phones have similar lock functionality.

The warning is bad news because phone owners are human, and humans are often the easiest security system to defeat. Phishing schemes that target phone theft victims are big business. Back in 2017, security reporter Brian Krebs documented “phishing as a service” platforms that did it at scale, on a subscription basis. Vice found toolkits like ProKit for phishing to unlock phones on sale for around $75.

We’ve already written about how the phone theft industry operates. Police in the UK recently uncovered a network stealing up to 40,000 phones per year. Most were shipped overseas to countries including China, where they would be used as profitably as possible. Locked phones might be broken up for parts, but a phone restored to factory settings that can be activated from scratch is far more valuable.

What to do if your iPhone is stolen

Ignore any messages from “Apple” claiming your lost phone has been found. The NCSC says Apple will never text or email customers about a recovered device.

If you lose your phone, turn on Lost Mode right away in Find My to lock it and display your contact message. Use a different contact number or email (not the one linked to your Apple ID or main phone) so scammers can’t use that information to target you.

Protect your SIM, too: enable PIN protection immediately, and ask your carrier to block or replace the SIM if the phone has been stolen.

We can’t easily stop thieves stealing people’s phones, or control who sees our phones after they leave our hands. But a little forethought now can help you to stop criminals from accessing your digital life or selling your phone on in its current form if it does enter the underground supply chain.

---

We don’t just report on scams—we help detect them

Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. If something looks dodgy to you, check if it’s a scam using Malwarebytes Scam Guard, a feature of our mobile protection products. Submit a screenshot, paste suspicious content, or share a text or phone number, and we’ll tell you if it’s a scam or legit. Download Malwarebytes Mobile Security for iOS or Android and try it today!

As GenAI transforms cyberattacks and defenses, organizations must strengthen the human layer. Learn how AI multiplies both risk and resilience in 2025.

The post Generative AI: The Double-Edged Sword of Cybersecurity  appeared first on Security Boulevard.

The days of human analysts manually sorting through endless security alerts are numbered. By 2028, artificial intelligence (AI) agents will handle 80% of that work in most security operations centers worldwide, according to a new IDC report. But while AI promises to revolutionize defense, it’s also supercharging the attackers. IDC predicts that by 2027, 80%..

The post Your Security Team Is About to Get an AI Co-Pilot — Whether You’re Ready or Not: Report appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Those who follow the DNS abuse landscape closely may have noticed a rise in activity and abuse reports related to TDS. The use of this infrastructure for malicious purposes is becoming increasingly common. In this blog, we look at how TDS are being exploited to facilitate abuse, why they present challenges for takedowns, and what we can do as a community to address the problem.

The post Traffic Distribution System (TDS) abuse – What’s hiding behind the veil? appeared first on Security Boulevard.

AI-driven social engineering is transforming cyberattacks from costly, targeted operations into scalable, automated threats. As generative models enable realistic voice, video, and text impersonation, organizations must abandon stored secrets and move toward cryptographic identity systems to defend against AI-powered deception.

The post In an AI World, Every Attack is a Social Engineering Attack     appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Traditional security awareness training is now undermining enterprise security and productivity. As AI-generated phishing eliminates familiar “red flags,” organizations must move beyond vigilance culture toward AI-assisted trust calibration—combining cognitive science and machine intelligence to rebuild trust, reduce false positives, and enhance real security outcomes.

The post Security Training Just Became Your Biggest Security Risk  appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Caller ID spoofing causes nearly $1 billion (EUR 850 million) in financial losses from fraud and scams each year, according to a new Europol position paper that calls for technical and regulatory solutions to fight the problem. Phone calls and texts are the primary attack vectors, accounting for about 64% of reported cases, Europol said in the report. Caller ID spoofing is accomplished by manipulating the information displayed on a user’s caller ID, typically using Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) services or specialized apps to show a fake name or number “that appears legitimate and trustworthy,” Europol said. “The ability of malicious actors to conceal their true identity and origin, severely impedes the capacity of law enforcement agencies (LEAs) to trace and prosecute cybercriminals,” Europol said.

Caller ID Spoofing Attack Types

Europol outlined some of the caller ID spoofing attack types seen by EU law enforcement agencies. Criminals often spoof caller IDs to impersonate organizations like banks, government agencies, utility companies, or even family members, in scam calls to get recipients to reveal sensitive information, make fraudulent payments, or initiating money transfers under false pretenses. Tech support scammers impersonate legitimate tech support services to convince victims of non-existent computer issues in order to demand payment, install malware or obtain remote access for exploitation. Caller ID spoofing can also be used in swatting attacks to make it appear that an emergency call originated from a victim’s address. Organized crime networks have even set up “spoofing-as-a-service” platforms to automate caller ID spoofing, “with the aim of lowering the barrier for others to be able to commit crimes,” Europol said. “By offering such services, criminals can easily impersonate banks, LEAs or other trusted entities.”

Europol Calls for Regulatory and Technical Response

Europol surveyed law enforcement agencies across 23 countries and found significant barriers to implementing anti-caller-ID spoofing measures. “This means that the combined population of approximately 400 million people remain susceptible to these types of attacks,” the report said. The law enforcement agency said there is an “urgent need for a coordinated, multi-faceted approach to mitigate cross-border caller ID spoofing.” “The transnational nature of spoofing attacks demands seamless information sharing and coordinated action among Internet Service Providers (ISPs), telecommunications providers, law enforcement and regulatory bodies,” the agency said. Among the technical controls that are needed are “robust international traceback mechanisms” that include a neutral, cross-jurisdictional system for hop-by-hop tracing, standardized processes for information sharing, and APIs and signaling checks. Also needed are mechanisms for validating inbound international calls, and vendor-neutral tools with standardized interfaces for Do Not Call (DNC)/ Do Not Originate (DNO) lists, unallocated number lists, blacklisting, and malformed number detection. “Through multi-stakeholder collaboration, to address emerging threats and develop effective countermeasures, digital security can be significantly enhanced,” Europol said. “This will ensure citizens are better protected from the adverse effects of caller ID spoofing.” The report also acknowledged the importance of being prepared for other mobile threats such as SIM-based scams, anti-regulatory subleasing, the use of anonymous prepaid services in cybercrime, callback scams and smishing attacks.

In a very recent and well-targeted phishing attempt, scammers tried to get hold of the 1Password credentials belonging to a Malwarebytes’ employee.

Stealing someone’s 1Password login would be like hitting the jackpot for cybercriminals, because they potentially export all the saved logins the target stored in the password manager.

The phishing email looked like this:

“Your 1Password account has been compromised

Unfortunately, Watchtower has detected that your 1Password account password has been found in a data breach. This password protects access to your entire vault.

Take action immediately

To keep your account secure, please take the following actions:

– Change your 1Password account password

– Enable two-factor authentication

– Review your account activity

Secure my account now

If you need help securing your account, or have any questions, contact us. Our team is on hand to provide expert, one-on-one support.”

While the email looks convincing enough, you can spot a few red flags.

• The sender’s address watchtower@eightninety[.]com does not belong to 1Password, which typically use the domain @1password.com.
• If you hover over the “Secure my account now” button you’ll notice that it points to: https://mandrillapp[.]com/track/click/30140187/onepass-word[.]com?p={long-identifier}

Although 1Password’s Watchtower feature can send alerts about compromised passwords, it does so by checking its database of known data breaches and then notifying you directly within the 1Password app or through very specific emails about the breach—not by sending a generic message like this.

Obviously, the onepass-word[.]com is a feeble attempt to make it look legitimate. I guess all the good typosquats were already taken or protected. What’s interesting is that the “Contact us” link goes to the legitimate support.1password.com, although it also flows through a redirect through mandrillapp.

Mandrillapp is a transactional email API and delivery service provided by Mailchimp. It enables organizations to send automated, event-driven emails like order confirmations, password resets, and shipping notifications. Mandrill also provides delivery tracking and statistics to their customers.

What the scammers may not have realized is that Mandrillapp doesn’t forward people to known phishing websites.

Shortly after the emails went out on October 2, the domain was already classified as a phishing site by several vendors. By October 3, anyone that clicked the button would end up viewing an error message on mandrillapp[.]com saying bad url - reference number: {23 character string}.

But early birds would have seen this form:

Anyone who fell for this scam would have sent their 1Password credentials straight to the phishing crew.

On September 25, 2025, Hoax-Slayer reported about a very similar phishing expedition. This might indicate that this was the first—and probably is not the last—attempt, so be warned.

With the key to your password vault, cybercriminals could take over all your important accounts and potentially steal your identity, so be very careful about where and when you use these credentials.

Our advice:

• Do not click any links or buttons in an unsolicited email
• Do not provide any of your 1Password credentials or personal information.
• If you are concerned about your 1Password account, go directly to the official 1Password website or app and check your account status there.
• Use up-to-date real-time protection which includes a web protection module.

Indicators of compromise (IOCs)

Email address:

watchtower@eightninety[.]com

Domain Phishing website:

onepass-word[.]com

---

We don’t just report on threats – we help safeguard your entire digital identity

Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. Protect your—and your family’s—personal information by using identity protection.

This site turns your URL into something sketchy-looking.

For example, www.schneier.com becomes
https://cheap-bitcoin.online/firewall-snatcher/cipher-injector/phishing_sniffer_tool.html?form=inject&host=spoof&id=bb1bc121&parameter=inject&payload=%28function%28%29%7B+return+%27+hi+%27.trim%28%29%3B+%7D%29%28%29%3B&port=spoof.

Found on Boing Boing.

Last week on Malwarebytes Labs:

• ChatGPT Deep Research zero-click vulnerability fixed by OpenAI
• Disrupted phishing service was after Microsoft 365 credentials
• Update your Chrome today: Google patches 4 vulnerabilities including one zero-day
• Age verification and parental controls coming to ChatGPT to protect teens
• 224 malicious apps removed from the Google Play Store after ad fraud campaign discovered
• Airline data broker selling 5 billion passenger records to US government
• Update your Apple devices to fix dozens of vulnerabilities
• Grok, ChatGPT, other AIs happy to help phish senior citizens
• “A dare, a challenge, a bit of fun:” Children are hacking their own schools’ systems, says study
• Watch out for the “We are hiring” remote online evaluator message scam

Stay safe!

---

We don’t just report on threats—we remove them

Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. Keep threats off your devices by downloading Malwarebytes today.

Microsoft and Cloudflare have disrupted a Phishing-as-a-Service operation, known as RaccoonO365.

The primary goal of RaccoonO365 (or Storm-2246 as Microsoft calls it) was to rent out a phishing toolkit that specialized in stealing Microsoft 365 credentials. They were successful in at least 5,000 cases, spanning 94 countries since July 2024.

The operation provided the cybercriminals’ customers with stolen credentials, cookies, and data which they in turn could use to plunder OneDrive, SharePoint, and Outlook accounts for information to use in financial fraud, extortion, or to serve as initial access for larger attacks.

Roughly an attack would look like this:

• Emails were sent to victims with an attachment containing a link or QR code.
• The malicious link led to a page with a simple CAPTCHA. This and other anti-bot techniques were implemented to evade analysis without raising suspicion from the victim.
• After solving the CAPTCHA, the victim was redirected to a fake Microsoft O365 login page designed to harvest the entered credentials.

RaccoonO365 built its operation on top of legitimate infrastructure in an attempt to avoid detection. Leveraging free accounts, they strategically deployed Cloudflare workers to act as an intermediary layer, shielding their backend phishing servers from direct public exposure.

Reacting to this abuse of its services, Cloudflare teamed up with Microsoft’s Digital Crimes Unit (DCU). Using a court order granted by the Southern District of New York, the DCU seized 338 websites associated with RaccoonO365.

The danger of phishing kits like these is clear. Even non-technical criminals can lease a 30-day plan for $355 (to be paid in cryptocurrency) and get their hands on valid Microsoft O365 credentials. With the latest new feature of the phishing kit, users of the kit can even receive codes for certain multi-factor authentication (MFA) methods.

From there they can move forward to data theft, financial fraud, or even use the credentials to infiltrate an organization to deploy ransomware. And to give you an idea, RaccoonO365 customers were able to send emails to 9,000 targets per day. The suspected leaders of the operation had over 850 members on Telegram and have received at least US$100,000 in cryptocurrency payments.

The takedown of the websites and the attribution to a Nigerian suspect cut off the cybercriminals’ revenue streams, and significantly increased RaccoonO365’s operational costs. Besides that, the main suspect is believed to be the main coder behind the project and his apprehension by international law enforcement is likely to be a major blow to the operation.

Now, RaccoonO365 phishing kit customers can start worrying about how much of their information could be revealed in the aftermath of this disruption.

We’ll keep you posted.

Don’t fall for phishing attempts

In the operations run by RaccoonO365 two simple rules could have saved you from lots of trouble.

• Don’t click on links in unsolicited attachments
• Check if the website address in the browser matches the domain you expect to be on (eg. Microsoft.com).

Other important tips to stay safe from phishing in general:

• Verify the sender: Always check if the sender’s email address matches what you would expect it to be. It’s not always conclusive but it can help you spot some attempts.
• Check through an independent channel if the sender actually sent you an attachment or a link.
• Use up-to-date security software, preferably with a web protection component.
• Keep your device and all its software updated.
• Use multi-factor authentication for every account you can.
• Use a password manager. Password managers will not auto-fill a password to a fake site, even if it looks like the real deal to you.

---

We don’t just report on threats – we help safeguard your entire digital identity

Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. Protect your—and your family’s—personal information by using identity protection.

If you are under the impression that cybercriminals need to get their hands on compromised AI chatbots to help them do their dirty work, think again.

Some AI chatbots are just so user friendly that they can help the user craft phishing text, and even malicious HTML and Javascript code.

A few weeks ago we published an article about the actions Anthropic was taking to stop its Claude AI from helping cybercriminals launch a cybercrime spree.

A recent investigation by Reuters journalists showed that Grok was more than happy to help them craft and perfect a phishing email targeting senior citizens. Grok is the AI marketed by Elon Musk’s xAI. Reuters reported:

“Grok generated the deception after being asked by Reuters to create a phishing email targeting the elderly. Without prodding, the bot also suggested fine-tuning the pitch to make it more urgent.”

In January 2025, we told you about a report that AI-supported spear phishing mails were equally as effective as phishing emails thought up by experts, and able to fool more than 50% of targets. But since then, the development of AI has grown exponentially and researchers are worrying about how to recognize AI-crafted phishing.

Phishing is the first step in many cybercrime campaigns. It poses an enormous problem with billions of phishing emails sent out every day. AI helps criminals to create more variation which makes pattern detection less effective and it helps them fine tune the messages themselves. And Reuters focused on senior citizens for a reason.

The FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) 2024 report confirms that Americans aged 60 and older filed 147,127 complaints and lost nearly $4.9 billion to online fraud, representing a 43% increase in losses and a 46% increase in complaints compared to 2023.

Besides Grok, the reporters tested five other popular AI chatbots: ChatGPT, Meta AI, Claude, Gemini, and DeepSeek. Although most of the AI chatbots protested at first and cautioned the user not to use the emails in a real-life scenario, in the end their “will to please” helped overcome these obstacles.

Fred Heiding, a Harvard University researcher and an expert in phishing helped Reuters put the crafted emails to the test. Using a targeted approach to reach those most likely to fall for them, about 11% of the seniors clicked on the emails sent to them.

An investigation by Cybernews showed that Yellow.ai, an agentic AI provider for businesses such as Sony, Logitech, Hyundai, Domino’s, and hundreds of other brands could be persuaded to produce malicious HTML and JavaScript code. It even allowed attackers to bypass checks to inject unauthorized code into the system.

In a separate test by Reuters, Gemini produced a phishing email, saying it was “for educational purposes only,” but helpfully added that “for seniors, a sweet spot is often Monday to Friday, between 9:00 AM and 3:00 PM local time.”

After damaging reports like these are released, AI companies often build in additional guardrails for their chatbots, but that only highlights an ongoing dilemma in the industry. When providers tighten restrictions to protect users, they risk pushing people toward competing models that don’t play by the same rules.

Every time a platform moves to shut down risky prompts or limit generated content, some users will look for alternatives with fewer safety checks or ethical barriers. That tug of war between user demand and responsible restraint will likely fuel the next round of debate among developers, researchers, and policymakers.

---

We don’t just report on scams—we help detect them

Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. If something looks dodgy to you, check if it’s a scam using Malwarebytes Scam Guard, a feature of our mobile protection products. Submit a screenshot, paste suspicious content, or share a text or phone number, and we’ll tell you if it’s a scam or legit. Download Malwarebytes Mobile Security for iOS or Android and try it today!

Cybersecurity publications are rife with headlines about breaches and threats, but sometimes things aren’t always what they seem. In fact sometimes they’re plain wrong (remember toothbrushgate)? This week, Google highlighted another story that it said was fake – and this one was about its own services.

“Several inaccurate claims surfaced recently that incorrectly stated that we issued a broad warning to all Gmail users about a major Gmail security issue. This is entirely false,” it said in a blog post debunking the claim.

The blog post doesn’t actually mention what the fake claim is, presumably in an attempt not to spread it. So we’re left guessing. What’s the biggest, scariest cybersecurity claim made about Google lately? Probably the one about Google warning 2.5 billion users about a recent attack on its systems.

The most difficult falsehoods to debunk are those where there’s a grain of truth. In this case there was an attack on Google’s systems. What’s at issue is how bad the attack was and what it did afterwards.

Here’s what happened. In June, Google was compromised by a group that it calls UNC6040 (the group is also widely known as ‘ShinyHunters’). This group targets companies that use the Salesforce enterprise software. It ‘voice phishes’ employees from those companies, impersonating IT staff and persuading them to enter their credentials on a web page. that page authorizes the intruders to access their Salesforce account, downloading sensitive data.

“The data retrieved by the threat actor was confined to basic and largely publicly available business information, such as business names and contact details,” Google said in its blog post about the incident, adding that it had notified all users by August 8.

However, some have suggested that Google’s ShinyHunters compromise has put 2.5 billion users at risk from phishing attacks, and that Google sent out an emergency warning to them. That story appears to have gone viral, and Google says it’s wrong. It didn’t send out that warning, and in spite of the attack on its systems, most of its users aren’t at any more risk than they were before.

“While it’s always the case that phishers are looking for ways to infiltrate inboxes, our protections continue to block more than 99.9% of phishing and malware attempts from reaching users,” the company said in its refutation.

The cybersecurity press is prone to sensational headlines. But publishing clickbait helps no one in the end, of course, because people can only stand so much panic. Eventually they’ll switch off, making it more difficult for legitimate, measured security alerts to make it through.

The fact that Google users aren’t in imminent elevated danger doesn’t change the need for basic cybersecurity hygiene. As Google points out, potential attackers are always rattling our digital doorknobs. We should always be on our guard and make it more difficult for them to get in.

“As best practices for additional protection, we encourage users to use a secure password alternative like Passkeys, and to follow these best practices to spot and report phishing attacks,” it concluded.

---

We don’t just report on threats—we remove them

Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. Keep threats off your devices by downloading Malwarebytes today.

A few weeks ago we warned our readers of a phishing campaign targeting Instagram users that didn’t resort to the usual links to phishing websites, but used mailto: links instead. Now, it seems that these scammers have turned their attention to Facebook users.

It works like this: The target receives an email saying that your Facebook account was logged into from a new device. Even though the subject line says “We’ve Received a request to Reset your password for Facebook Account !”

“A user just logged into your Facebook account from a new device iPhone 14 PRO Max. We are sending you this email to verify it’s really you.”

All the links you see in the email: “Report the user”, “Yes, me”, “unsubscribe”, and even the obfuscated email address at the bottom, do exactly the same thing.

They open your default email program with a pre-addressed message with a subject line that matches the button/text you clicked on.

The email addresses these messages will be sent to are the same as the ones we saw with the Instagram phish:

• prestige@vacasa[.]uk.com (typosquat of vacasa.com vacation rentals)
• ministry@syntec[.]uk.com (typosquat of syntechnologies.co.uk hardware provider)
• technique@pdftools[.]com.de (typosquat of pdf-tools.com software provider)
• service@boss[.]eu.com (several possibilities)
• threaten@famy[.]in.net (science news site, possibly compromised)
• difficulty@blackdiamond[.]com.se (known malicious domain)
• anticipation@salomonshoes[.]us.com (typosquat of salomon.com running shoes)

This is kind of surprising since we found last time that several of the addresses were unresponsive.

The unusual Top-Level Domains (TLDs) like uk.com, com.de, eu.com, com.se, and us.com are actually second-level domain extensions operated by private entities, not official country-code top-level domains.

Though these domain extensions themselves are legitimate registration services, their openness and global accessibility mean they can be misused by phishers and other cybercriminals to make them look more legitimate or country-specific than generic .com domains. They may also be used to typosquat legitimate domains.

How to avoid Facebook phishing

Since we can expect to see more phishing campaigns that use mailto: links, here are some tips to avoid falling victim to such a scam.

• As with regular links, scrutinize the destination of an email link. Even if the domain looks legitimate, your Facebook account isn’t secured by a shoe maker or vacation provider, or someone using a gmail address. The email address should be one that belongs to Facebook or Meta.
• Remember that legitimate companies will not ask you to mail them your account details, credentials, or other sensitive information.
• If there’s an urgency to respond to an email, take a pause before you do. This is a classic scammer trick to get you to act before you can think.
• Don’t reply if the warning looks suspicious in any way. Sending an email will tell the phishers that your email address is active, and it will be targeted even more.
• Do an online search about the email you received, in case others are posting about similar scams.
• Use Malwarebytes Scam Guard to assess the message. It will tell you whether it’s a scam or give you tips how you can find out if it isn’t sure.

We don’t just report on threats – we help protect your social media

Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. Protect your social media accounts by using Malwarebytes Identity Theft Protection.